• Marine Record
• Open Access

• Received: 7 December 2018
• Accepted: 6 February 2019
• Published: 20 March 2019

Understanding the range and distribution of pelagic and highly mobile species, like Mobulid rays, is of critical importance. Most members of this ray group are highly threatened and may face extirpation where targeted in large fisheries (Couturier et al. 2012b; Ward-Paige et al. 2013; Dulvy et al. 2014; Croll et al. 2015). Despite a surge in effort over the last two decades to study manta rays, many key aspects are still poorly understood and require additional investigation (Stewart et al. 2018). For instance, the global distributions of both recognized species, Mobula birostris and Mobula alfredi, have, to a large extent, been inferred or projected from opportunistic sighting records, a few dozen focused studies, fisheries data, historical records and perceived habitat suitability (Kashiwagi et al. 2011; Lawson et al. 2017; Marshall et al. 2018a, 2018b). Further investigation is required to confirm existing distribution information and to fill in the gaps in areas where little to no information is currently available. Presently, M. birostris, the more widely distributed species, exhibits a broad, circumglobal distribution in all three of the world’s major oceans (Kashiwagi et al. 2011; Lawson et al. 2017; Marshall et al. 2018b). To date there have not been any verified or published records of M. alfredi from the Atlantic or on either side of the American continent (Lawson et al. 2017). M. alfredi is widely distributed throughout the Indian Ocean, including large populations in isolated island chains like the Maldives and Chagos Archipelagos (Lawson et al. 2017). M. alfredi is also commonly encountered in the West Pacific (Lawson et al. 2017) but published accounts report this species occurring only as far east as Fatu Hiva (10° 29_ S, 138° 37_ W) in the Marquesas Islands (Mourier 2012).

M. alfredi appears to display a more resident behavior than M. birostris, with a fairly restricted home range for such a capable swimmer. Some studies have suggested that M. alfredi’s range may be quite small (Kessel et al. 2017). Deakos et al. (2011) reported that despite considerable effort, no matches were found when cross referencing 290 individual manta rays from one study area in Maui, Hawaii and 145 photo-identified individuals in waters off Kona on the Big Island, a transit distance of only ~ 150 km. Setyawan et al. (2018) recently found that M. alfredi tagged in the north of Raja Ampat did not venture to the southern end of the seascape a distance of only 180 km. Other studies have shown that M. alfredi can and often do make inter-island movements between neighboring islands up to 450 km straight-line distance apart (Homma et al. 1999; Kitchen-Wheeler 2008; Germanov and Marshall 2014). However, the longest documented straight-line movements of M. alfredi have occurred along continental coastlines, in locations like Australia (650 km in Couturier et al. 2014) and Mozambique (500 km in Marshall unpublished data). In a recent study of M. alfredi in Australia, satellite tracked reef manta rays moved across a latitudinal range of 1035 km along the northern eastern coast, travelling up to 2441 km in 118 d (Jaine et al. 2014) and venturing as far as 520 km in any one direction from the tagging site. Notably the individual rays tracked in this study occupied both regional shelf and offshore waters swimming up to 155 km off the continental shelf presumably to forage in deeper waters. Perle (2011) also noted that satellite tagged M. alfredi around the Palmyra Atoll in the Pacific swam offshore but no further than 126 km from the atoll, suggesting that their dependence on shallow inshore reefs for cleaning may limit their range into open ocean environments. Aplethora of other studies confirm the regular, habitual use of shallow water habitats, particularly cleaning stations, where individuals are cleaned by attending fish while they socialize with conspecifics (Dewar et al. 2008; Deakos et al. 2011; Kitchen-Wheeler et al. 2011; Marshall 2009; Couturier et al. 2018).

Jaine et al. (2014) noted that while M. alfredi moved across wide geographical areas along the eastern Australian coastline, individuals often returned to the area they were tagged. Other telemetry-based studies have demonstrated individual variation in movement patterns but agree that home ranges are relatively restricted and that individuals regularly and repeatedly visit known sites within a larger home range (Dewar et al. 2008; Marshall 2009; van Duinkerken 2010; Kessel et al. 2017; Couturier et al. 2018; Setyawan et al. 2018). Long-term site fidelity has been confirmed and quite commonly reported in dedicated photographic studies of M. alfredi as well, with photo identified individuals being seen at the same aggregation areas over short and long time periods (Homma et al. 1999; Kitchen-Wheeler et al. 2011; Marshall et al. 2011; Couturier et al. 2014) providing additional support to the notion that individuals remain within restricted home ranges. The seasonal movements and longer distance migrations that do occur are thought to be related to seasonal shifts in resource use (Dewar 2008; Couturier et al. 2012a; Jaine et al. 2012; Jaine et al. 2014) or reproduction, in response to strong seasonal weather patterns such as the monsoon season (Anderson et al. 2011; Setyawan et al. 2018).

On September 5th, 2018 during a scientific research expedition to Cocos Island, Costa Rica, a female manta ray was encountered during a scientific dive around Ulloa, a shallow dive site (~ 14 m depth) located in the northeast side of the island (Fig. 1). Underwater video shots were taken of the dorsal and ventral coloration patterns of the individual, and an ID photo taken of the unique ventral spot patterning (following Marshall et al. 2011; Marshall and Pierce 2012) to support re-sighting efforts (Fig. 2). Upon reviewing the footage the individual was confirmed to be a reef manta ray (using the key provided in Marshall et al. 2009). The approximate disc width (DW) of this individual was 3.5 m, and appeared to be in the later stages of pregnancy based on the large bulge on its stomach and back (Marshall and Bennett 2010) (Fig. 2d). The individual was close to the bottom swimming slowly against the current with the cephalic lobes fully extended, however it was not feeding at the time. The individual was successfully fitted externally with a V16 (Vemco Ltd., Nova Scotia, Canada) acoustic tag using a pole spear as a part of a larger on-going study of the habitat use of elasmobranchs around the island.

This is the first sighting of M. alfredi in the Eastern Pacific, nearly 6000 km east from the nearest confirmed sighting location in the Marquesas. Despite numerous mobulid-focused research studies occurring from La Paz to Peru, this species has never been recorded along this coast (Lawson et al. 2017). An open-sourced global online manta ray database, Manta Matcher (https://mantamatcher.org), which includes photographic contributions from ‘citizen scientists’, also has not registered any sightings of this species, despite registers of over 2816 manta rays from this region (Marshall and Holmberg 2018). The Manta Matcher database, which currently holds records of over 9839 individually identified manta rays, was also used to scan globally for a match of this individual with no success (Marshall and Holmberg 2018).

Deep water and sizeable distances between the island chains in the mid-Pacific and the islands and seamounts in the Eastern Pacific presumably present a natural barrier for dispersal of M. alfredi. Cocos Island sits offshore to mainland Costa Rica. The nearest land or shallow water habitats are more than 500 km away in any direction. With no other confirmed sightings of this species in the Eastern Pacific, it is likely that this individual has swum from an aggregation site between the Hawaiian Islands (a distance of over 7596 km from the closest known aggregation area off Keauhou) and the Marquesas (a distance of over 5984 km from Fatu Hiva) (Fig. 3). Rate of movement estimates have noted M. alfredi can travel between 85 and 95 km a day straight line distance (van Duinkerken 2010; Jaine et al. 2014), averaging speeds of ~ 3.5 km per hour. These estimates suggest that such a long-distance crossing would have taken this individual over two months at a minimum.

While it has not yet been confirmed if the ventral spot patterns on the underside of manta rays are heritable, global databases appear to show general regional patterns in colouration/pattern types (Marshall and Holmberg 2018; Stevens and Manta 2016). The manta ray sighted off Ulloa at Cocos Island exhibited similar coloration patterns to those seen in both the Hawaiian Island and the Marquesas, which may be further suggestive of its origin.

Manta rays are not commonly sighted at Cocos Islands (White et al. 2015) but when they are encountered S.C.U.B.A. divers report seeing M. birostris. Data collected by divemasters over the past 21 years (1992 to 2013) have shown an 89% decline in relative abundance of this species around the island (Sibaja-Cordero 2008; White et al. 2015). Given that this is not a common aggregation area for manta rays, it is surprising to record the presence of M. alfredi at this location. Since the individual was fitted with an acoustic transmitter we will be able to monitor its habitat use and long-term residency at Cocos Island.

The single opportunistic encounter of M. alfredi at Cocos Island in the Eastern Pacific does not warrant an extension of the known range of this species. However, while authors cautiously assume that this individual may have unintentionally migrated to this location, we cannot ignore the possibility that small populations of M. alfredi may in fact exist in the Eastern Pacific. Major aggregation areas for manta rays are being still actively being discovered. While considerable efforts have been made to identify critical habitats for manta rays in the Eastern Pacific, many areas have still not been comprehensively explored.

This reported encounter does offer tantalizing clues about the way this species may have successfully colonized much of its range. While current research suggests that physical barriers and in particular open expanses of sea typically deter individuals from undertaking regular long-distance migrations, we are now left to consider that M. alfredi, under certain circumstances, may occasionally undertake long-distance movements. Is it worth noting that other long distance movements by other elasmobranches with even lower ability to conduct long distance migrations have been reported, such as a juvenile male blacktip reef shark (Carcharhinus melanopterus), one of the most common Indo-Pacific reef sharks, reported for the first time in the Eastern Pacific on April 29, 2012 (López-Garro et al. 2012). The early life stage of the individual suggests a pregnant female had given birth near Cocos Island after travelling over 5000 Km across the Pacific Ocean (López-Garro et al. 2012). In fact, several species of Indo-Pacific elasmobranches have successfully managed to colonize the Eastern Pacific, such as silvertip sharks (Carcharhinus albimarginatus) and whitetip sharks (Triaendon obesus), while other species such as the marbled ray (Taeniura meyeni) which is endemic to Cocos Island and Galapagos Island, remain restricted in either the the Eastern or Western Pacific (Garrison 2005).

As a species, M. alfredi is wide spread in the Western Pacific and Indian Oceans with large populations occurring around relatively isolated islands and archipelagos. The successful colonization of these regions through time would have required accidental or purposeful long-range migrations of pregnant individuals to these areas to seed founder populations. Considering their wide-spread occurrence in these oceans, it is likely that these events occur more commonly than expected from their studied behavioral trends, which raises the question as to why colonization attempts by M. alfredi in the Eastern Pacific have been unsuccessful, and the species has failed to thrive in this productive region.