Open Access

First record of Syllis vittata (Polychaeta: Syllidae) in the Dutch North Sea

Marine Biodiversity Records201710:16

https://doi.org/10.1186/s41200-017-0120-3

Received: 29 December 2016

Accepted: 29 May 2017

Published: 6 June 2017

Abstract

Background

Syllis vittata is present from British Waters to the Mediterranean Sea, Morocco and the Canary Islands and recorded from the South African coast and Indian Ocean.

Results and conclusion

In this paper, S. vittata is reported for the first time in the Dutch EEZ.

Keywords

Syllidae Syllis vittata polychaeta North Sea Gas platform Distribution First record

Background

Syllidae is a highly diverse family of polychaete worms with over 700 species described in 74 different genera (Aguado and San Martín 2009; San Martín and Aguado 2014). They are easily recognizable by their proventriculus, which is situated behind the pharynx and works as a suction pump during feeding processes (Aguado and San Martín 2009; Fauchald and Jumars 1979; San Martín 2003), often visible through the body wall. However, the taxonomy of the Syllidae is often problematic due to the high variability of its morphological features and life history traits (San Martín 2003). It has been recently divided into five subfamilies (Anoplosyllinae, Autolytinae, Eusyllinae, Exogoninae and Syllinae) according to phylogenetic relationships (Aguado and San Martín 2009).

Syllidae mostly reproduce by epitoky, within which two modes are recognized: epigamy (characteristic for Anoplosyllinae, Eusyllinae and Exogoninae) and schizogamy, i.e., stolonization (characteristic for Syllinae and Autolytinae; Aguado and San Martín 2009; Franke 1999; Musco et al. 2010). The reproductive strategy of Syllis vittata Grube 1840 is still unknown, however it is believed to be similar to the majority of other Syllinae species (Musco et al. 2010). Furthermore, these authors suggest that S. vittata might be a simultaneous hermaphrodite, though not necessarily with internal or self-fertilization.

Syllids are primarily observed in shallow waters in a variety of marine habitats worldwide, although they can also be found in deep waters (San Martín 2003). S. vittata, in particular, is present in the Eastern Atlantic, from British Waters to Morocco and the Canary Islands (López et al. 1996; San Martín 2003), in South African coast (Berrisford 1969), in Indian Ocean (Mozambique and Natal; (López et al. 1996; Musco and Giangrande 2005; San Martín 2003), and in the Mediterranean Sea (López et al. 1996; Musco and Giangrande 2005; San Martín 2003). The type locality is Palermo (Italy). In the North Sea, early records suggest that this species was only found on the coast of Norfolk (Ostler 2005). In this study, Syllis vittata is recorded for the first time in the Dutch area of the North Sea.

Methods

Two specimens of Syllis vittata were found in the Dutch area of the North Sea, on a gas platform (platform L15-A, situated 11 km off the coast of the island of Vlieland; Fig. 1), in samples processed for the RECON (Reef effects of structures in the North Sea: Islands or connections?) project. Samples were collected with a surface supplied airlift, as described in Coolen et al. (2015a) and fixed in a borax buffered 6% formaldehyde solution. In the laboratory, before the identification process, specimens were placed in a 70% ethanol and 3% glycerol solution. For the identification, Keys provided by San Martín (2003) and San Martín and Worsfold (2015)were used. Both specimens were stored at the Wageningen Marine Research benthic reference collection.
Fig. 1

Location of four platforms sampled for the RECON project Sampled platforms Platform where S. vittata specimens were sampled

Results

Material examined

L15-A platform, The Netherlands, 53.3295°N, 4.8301°E (WGS84), 5 and 6 June 2014, 2 specimens, 7 and 20 m depth.

  • SYSTEMATICS

  • Order PHYLLODOCIDA Dales 1962

  • Suborder NEREIDIFORMIA

  • Family SYLLIDAE Grube 1850

  • Subfamily SYLLINAE Rioja 1925

  • Genus Syllis Savigny in Lamarck 1818

  • Syllis vittata Grube 1840

Syllis (Typosyllis) vittata Fauvel 1923:263–264, fig. 98i–l. Day 1967:252, Fig. 12.4.m–o

Syllis aurita Claparède, 1864: 539-540, plate V fig. 5

Syllis buskii McIntosh, 1908

Syllis vittata San Martín 2003:430–432, figs. 236–237.

General distribution

From British Waters to the Mediterranean Sea, Morocco and the Canary Islands (Eastern Atlantic) and recorded on the South African coast, Mozambique and Natal (Indian Ocean)

Type locality

Palermo (Italy)

Description of examined material

Length up to 10.75 mm, width 0.9 mm. Body broad, robust and cylindrical, 40 chaetigers, with a dorsal dark transverse stripe per segment (Fig. 2a). Prostomium wider than long, with two pairs of eyes in a trapezoidal arrangement. Antennae moniliform; median antenna inserted in the middle of the prostomium, with 30 articles; lateral ones inserted before the anterior eyes, with 23–25 articles. Dorsal tentacular cirri with 35–38 articles and ventral cirri with 21–24 articles, very similar to dorsal ones. Dorsal cirri alternating long (longer than the width of the corresponding segment), with 30–35 articles, and short (as long as the corresponding segment), with 20–24 articles. Anterior parapodia with 20 compound chaetae (Fig. 2b), mid body parapodia with 15 (Fig. 2c) and 12 in posterior parapodia (Fig. 2d), all unidentate. One bifid serrated dorsal simple chaeta (Fig. 2e), only present in posterior parapodia. Aciculae possess a rounded tip (Fig. 2f). and their number decreases towards the posterior end, with only one in the last chaetigers. Pharynx extending through 10 segments, with a large, acute tooth, encircled by 10 large marginal papillae, placed near the pharyngeal opening (Fig. 2g). Proventriculus extending through 9 segments, with 38 rows of muscle cells.
Fig. 2

Syllis vittata : a) specimen 1, b) anterior chaetae, c) mid body chaetae, d) posterior chaetae, e) simple chaeta, f) posterior aciculae, g) pharyngeal tooth

Discussion

The presence of the polychaete Syllis vittata off the coast of the island of Vlieland represents its first record in the Dutch Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ). With this record, this species has only been found on two separate locations in the North Sea, with the other observation being old records off the coast of Norfolk (United Kingdom) by the Joint Nature Conservation Committee (JNCC), in 1993 (Ostler 2005).

The scarce observations of this species in the North Sea may be a result of its apparent preference for hard-bottom substrates, as Syllis vittata is usually found on rocky shores (Antoniadou et al. 2004; Cosentino 2011; López et al. 1996; Simon et al. 2014), calcareous substrates (Cardell and Gili 1988; López et al. 1996; San Martín 2003) and on Sabellaria and Mytilus colonies (López et al. 1996; San Martín 2003). Thousands of other artificial hard substrates are present in the Dutch North Sea (Coolen et al. 2015b) but natural hard substrates are scarce (Coolen et al. 2016). The biodiversity of hard substrates is understudied in the Netherlands. Its predilection for coastal habitats and a lack of research effort may justify why this species wasn’t found on the other two platforms analysed.

The wide distribution of Syllis vittata suggests that this might be a cryptogenic species. However, more information is needed to confirm this hypothesis.

Nevertheless, it is likely that Syllis vittata will colonise all the available hard substrates, and spread throughout the North Sea. The distribution limits of this species is, then, yet unclear.

Conclusion

Two specimens of Syllis vittata were observed on a gas platform 11 km off the coast of the island of Vlieland. This is the first record of this species in the Dutch EEZ. Ongoing monitoring is needed to verify the spread or loss of this species in the North Sea.

Declarations

Acknowledgments

ENGIE Exploration & Production Nederland B.V. allowed and facilitated us to sample their installations and we are especially grateful to Ed Schmidt, Nathalie Kaarls, Ulf Sjöqvist, Maico Vrijenhoeff, Ben Waardenburg and Kees van Braak for their help arranging this cooperation.

Further help was provided by Guillermo San Martín who confirmed the identification.

Funding

The work reported in this publication was funded through the Wageningen UR TripleP@Sea Innovation program (J.C., KB-14-007) and by the Dutch Department of Economic Affairs (J.C., KB-24-16), the Nederlandse Aardolie Maatschappij BV, Wintershall Holding GmbH, Energiebeheer Nederland B.V. and the INSITE North Sea fund via the RECON project.

Availability of data and materials

The data that support the findings of this study are available from Wageningen Marine Research but restrictions apply to the availability of these data, which were used under license for the current study, and so are not publicly available. Data are however available from the authors upon reasonable request and with permission of Wageningen Marine Research.

Authors’ contributions

IMD and MS carried out the identification of all Polychaeta present in all the samples. JWPC did the sampling and designed the study. BvdW and JC assisted with identifying the samples. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Wageningen Marine Research
(2)
Wageningen University, Chair group Aquatic Ecology and Water Quality Management
(3)
Rijkswaterstaat, Ministry of Infrastructure and the Environment

References

  1. Aguado MT, San Martín G. Phylogeny of Syllidae (Polychaeta) based on morphological data. Zool Scr. 2009;38(4):379–402.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Antoniadou C, Nicolaidou A, Chintiroglou C. Polychaetes associated with the sciaphilic alga community in the northern Aegean Sea: Spatial and temporal variability. Helgol Mar Res. 2004;58(3):168–82.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Berrisford CD. Biology and zoogeography of the vema seamount: a report on the first biological collection made on the summit. Trans R Soc South Africa. 1969;38(4):387–98.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Cardell MJ, Gili JM. Distribution of a population of annelid polychaetes in the “trottoir” of the midlittoral zone on the coast of North-East Spain, Western Mediterranean. Mar Biol. 1988;99(1):83–92.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Claparède, É. Glanures zootomiques parmi les annélides de Port-Vendres (Pyrénées Orientales). Mémoires de la Société de Physique et d'Histoire Naturelle de Genève. 1864;17(2):463–600, plates I-VIII.Google Scholar
  6. Coolen JWP, Bos OG, Glorius S, Lengkeek W, Cuperus J, Van der Weide BE, et al. Reefs, sand and reef-like sand: a comparison of the benthic biodiversity of habitats in the Dutch Borkum Reef Grounds. J Sea Res. 2015a;103:84–92.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Coolen JWP, Lengkeek W, Lewis G, Bos OG, van Walraven L, van Dongen U. First record of Caryophyllia smithii in the central southern North Sea: artificial reefs affect range extensions of sessile benthic species. Mar Biodivers Rec. 2015b;8(e140):4.Google Scholar
  8. Coolen JWP, Lengkeek W, Degraer S, Kerckhof F, Kirkwood RJ, Lindeboom HJ. Distribution of the invasive Caprella mutica and native Caprella linearis on artificial hard substrata in the North Sea: separation by habitat. Aquat Inv. 2016;11(4):437–49.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Cosentino A. Microhabitat selection in a local syllid assemblage with the first record of Syllis hyllebergi (Syllinae) in the central Mediterranean. Ital J Zool. 2011;78(May):267–79.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Dales RP. The polychaete Stomodeum and the inter-relationships of the families of Polychaeta. Proc Zool Soc London. 1962;139(3):389–428.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Day JH. A monograph on the Polychaeta of Southern Africa. Br Mus. 1967;656:1–878.Google Scholar
  12. Fauchald K, Jumars P. The diet of worms: a studie of Polychaete feeding gilds. Oceanogr Mar Biol Annu Rev. 1979;17:193–284.Google Scholar
  13. Fauvel P. Quatrième note préliminaire sur les Polychètes provenant des campagnées de l’Hirondelle et de la Princesse-Alice, ou deposées dans le Musée Océanographique de Monaco. Bull de l’Inst Océanog. 1923;270:1–80.Google Scholar
  14. Franke HD. Reproduction of the Syllidae (Annelida: Polychaeta). Hydrobiologia. 1999;402(2):39–55.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Grube AE. Actinien, Echinodermen und Würmer des Adriatischen- und Mittelmeers : nach eigenen Sammlungen beschrieben. 1840. p. 1–92.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Grube AE. The families of the annelids. Arch Nat Hist. 1850;16(1):249–364.Google Scholar
  17. Lamarck J-B. Histoire naturelle des animaux sans vertèbres préséntant les caractères généraux et particuliers de ces animaux, leur distribution, leurs classes, leurs familles, leurs genres, et la citation des principales espèces qui s’y rapportent; précédée d’une introduction offrant la détermination des caractères essentiels de l’animal, sa distinction du végétal et des autres corps naturels, enfin, l’exposition des principes fondamentaux de la zoologie. Verdière. 1818; p. 612Google Scholar
  18. López E, San Martín G, Jiménez M. Syllinae (Syllidae, Annelida, Polychaeta) from Chafarinas Islands (Alborán Sea, W. Mediterranean). Misc Zool. 1996;19(1):105–18.Google Scholar
  19. McIntosh, WC. A monograph of British Annelids. Ray Society of London, II. Part I. Polychaeta. Nephthydidae to Syllidae. 1908;1–232.Google Scholar
  20. Musco L, Giangrande A. Mediterranean Syllidae (Annelida: Polychaeta) revisited: Biogeography, diversity and species fidelity to environmental features. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 2005;304:143–53.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Musco L, Lepore E, Gherardi M, Sciscioli M, Mercurio M, Giangrande A. Sperm ultrastructure of three Syllinae (Annelida, Phyllodocida) species with considerations on syllid phylogeny and Syllis vittata reproductive biology. Zoomorphology. 2010;129(2):133–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Ostler R. Marine Nature Conservation Review (MNCR) and associated benthic marine data held and managed by JNCC. Jt. Nat. Conserv. Committee, Cent. Ecol. Hydrol. Aberdeenshire, UK. 2005. http://www.emodnet-biology.eu/. Accessed 16 Jun 2016.
  23. Rioja E. Anelidos poliquetos de San Vicente de la Barquera (Cantabrico). Trabajos del Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturale. Ser Zool. 1925;53:1–62.Google Scholar
  24. San Martín G. Annelida, Polychaeta II: Syllidae. In: Ramos MA et al. (Eds). Fauna Iber. vol. 21. Madrid. Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales. CSIC. 2003; p. 554.Google Scholar
  25. San Martín G, Aguado MT. Family Syllidae. In: Schmidt-Rhaesa A, editor. En Phyllodocida Nereidiformia. Handbook of Zoology, Annelida. A Natural History of the Phyla of the Animal Kingdom. Zürich: Verlag Walter der Gruyter GmbH & Co; 2014. p. 1–52.Google Scholar
  26. San Martín G, Worsfold TM. Guide and keys for the identification of Syllidae (Annelida, Phyllodocida) from the British Isles (reported and expected species). Zookeys. 2015;29(488):1–29.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Simon C, San Martín G, Robinson G. Two new species of Syllis (Polychaeta: Syllidae) from South Africa, one of them viviparous, with remarks on larval development and vivipary. J Mar Biol Assoc UK. 2014;94(04):729–46.View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s) 2017

Advertisement