Open Access

Records of five bryozoan species from offshore gas platforms rare for the Dutch North Sea

  • Esther D. Beukhof1, 2, 3Email author,
  • Joop W. P. Coolen2, 3,
  • Babeth E. van der Weide3,
  • Joël Cuperus3,
  • Hans de Blauwe4 and
  • Jerry Lust3, 5
Marine Biodiversity Records20169:91

https://doi.org/10.1186/s41200-016-0086-6

Received: 13 June 2016

Accepted: 14 July 2016

Published: 11 October 2016

Abstract

This study reports on bryozoan species collected at three offshore gas platforms in the Dutch part of the North Sea. Four out of thirteen observed species are considered as rare in the Netherlands, whereas Cribrilina punctata is a new species for Dutch waters.

Keywords

Bryozoa North Sea Netherlands Offshore Gas platform Cribrilina punctata Arachnidium fibrosum Electra monostachys Scruparia ambigua Scruparia chelata

Introduction

The Dutch continental shelf of the North Sea largely consists of sandy bottoms. Rocky substrates are only present on the Cleaver Bank (Schrieken et al. 2013), the Borkum Reef Grounds (Coolen et al. 2015) and the Texel Rough (personal observation J.W.P. Coolen). Furthermore, artificial hard substrates are formed by shipwrecks (Lengkeek et al. 2013a), wind farms (Lindeboom et al. 2011; Vanagt et al. 2013) and gas platforms (Van Buuren 1984; Van der Stap et al. 2015).

Bryozoa grow on various hard substrates such as rocks, shells, wood, and plastic material, but also on macroalgae and Hydrozoa (De Blauwe 2009). Previous observations of Bryozoa in the Netherlands concentrated on southern coastal areas (Faasse and De Blauwe 2004). Faasse et al. (2013) recently reviewed the list of known Dutch Bryozoa which now comprises a total of 58 marine and estuarine species. They excluded specimens found on beached material, but included fauna from several recent offshore surveys of the Cleaver Bank (Van Moorsel 2003), the Princess Amalia Wind Farm (PAWF; Vanagt et al. 2013) and a shipwreck on the sandy Dogger Bank (Schrieken et al. 2013).

This article reports on the finding of 13 bryozoan species on three offshore gas platform in the Dutch part of the North Sea. Of these species, Cribrilina punctata is new to the Dutch fauna, and four species are considered rare to the Dutch waters.

Materials and methods

The Bryozoa described here were observed during inventories of the fouling community of three stationary offshore gas platforms. The platforms differed in their distance from the Dutch shore, maximum depth and year of construction, and were sampled at different times during 2014 and 2015 (Table 1). Macrofauna samples were taken from the platform foundation by a commercial diver using a putty knife to detach the organisms and a surface supplied airlift sampler to collect them. In the airlift, all organisms were sieved over a 500 μm mesh. Further details of the airlift sampler and collection methods are described in Coolen et al. (2015). Triplicate samples were taken at 5 m depth intervals between 0 and 25 m and from the scour protection rocks on the bottom. After collection samples were fixed in a 6 % formalin solution buffered with 2 g L−1 borax. Following transport to the lab (between three and five days after collection) all organisms were conserved in 70 % ethanol until sorted by major taxonomic units and identified. All shells of Mytilus edulis, other biogenic hard substrates and the scour protection rocks were inspected for the presence of Bryozoa. Any detached colonies were identified as well.
Table 1

Three offshore gas platforms were visited during several inventories in 2014 and 2015. The platforms differed in their distance from shore, depth at the seabed and year of construction

Platform

Location

Distance from shore (km)

Maximum depth (m)

Year of construction

Sampling date

L10-G

53°29′N, 4°11′E

70

26

1984

June 2014

L10-A

53°24′N, 4°12′E

48

27

1972

April and June 2014, October 2015

L15-A

53°19′N, 4°49′E

5

21

1992

June 2014

For identification Hayward and Ryland (1998), Hayward and Ryland (1999) and De Blauwe (2009) were consulted. The World Register of Marine Species (WoRMS Editorial Board 2015) was used as a taxonomic standard. Specimens were observed using a Zeiss SteREO Discovery.V8 stereomicroscope. When a specimen was covered by a thin layer of organic material which impeded observing the zooids, it was immersed in bleach for half an hour, then rinsed and dried in order to reveal the calcified skeleton.

Results

In 35 samples, a total of 13 species of Bryozoa were observed (Table 2). In ten samples no Bryozoa were encountered. Here, the findings of four species rare to Dutch waters and one new species for the Netherlands are described in more detail.
Table 2

Bryozoa species encountered on the platform legs and/or the scour protection rocks at the bottom of the platforms L10-G, L10-A and L15-A

 

Platform legs

Scour protection rocks

Species

L10-G

L10-A

L10-G

L15-A

Alcyonidioides mytili

x

x

 

x

Arachnidium fibrosum a

x

x

 

x

Aspidelectra melolontha

  

x

 

Callopora dumerilii

x

x

x

 

Celleporella hyalina

x

x

  

Conopeum reticulum

x

x

x

x

Cribrilina punctata a

  

x

 

Electra monostachys a

  

x

 

Electra pilosa

x

x

x

x

Microporella ciliata

x

   

Schizomavella linearis

x

x

 

x

Scruparia ambigua a

x

x

  

Scruparia chelata a

x

x

  

aindicates species discussed in the article

Five young colonies of the cheilostomatous Cribrilina punctata were found on three scour protection rocks of platform L10-G consisting of 10 to approximately 30 non-ovicellate zooids (Fig. 1). A sub-oral bar with acute median mucro and 3–6 oral spines were present.
Fig. 1

Cribrilina punctata zooids as found on a scour protection rock at the bottom of the platform. Scale bar: 0.2 mm

The ctenostomatous Arachnidium fibrosum was encountered in two samples taken from the foundation of platform L10-G at 10 m depth. Both colonies were attached to Mytilus edulis. Another colony of A. fibrosum was observed on a scour protection rock collected at the bottom of platform L15-A. Zooids were arranged in rows, and the colonies were sometimes branched.

A colony of Electra monostachys comprising several dozens of zooids was found on one of the scour protection rocks from platform L10-G. De Blauwe (2009) described a radiating crust as being characteristic for the species; this shape was also observed here. In addition to the relatively long proximal spine and pair of shorter distally located spines, almost all zooids still had their 4–6 pairs of shorter spines located around the frontal membrane.

Two members of the genus Scruparia were encountered. Scruparia ambigua was observed in one sample attached to M. edulis collected at 10 m depth at platform L10-G, but detached specimens were found as well. Several samples from platform L10-A taken between 5 and 15 m depth also contained a number of S. ambigua colonies. Scruparia chelata was observed at different depths (5–25 m) on platforms L10-G and L10-A, both as detached specimens and attached to M. edulis.

Discussion

Cribrilina punctata

Cribrilina punctata is considered a rare species for the southern North Sea with only observations of beached specimens in the Netherlands on bivalve shells (NMNH; NMNH 1949), wood (NMR 1992) and plastic (De Ruijter 2014). Figure 2 shows all observations of C. punctata in the southern North Sea. The authors here now report the first observation of C. punctata attached to a fixed object on the Dutch continental shelf.
Fig. 2

Observations of Cribrilina punctata in the Netherlands (NMNH 1949; NMR 1992; Glorius et al. 2014), Belgium (De Blauwe 2009), France (VLIZ 2007), Germany (Schultze et al. 1990; De Kluijver 1991; Harms 1993; Kuhlenkamp and Kind 2012) and the United Kingdom (Rees et al. 2005; NRM 2010; Joint Nature Conservation Committee, 2005, Joint Nature Conservation Committee 2004; Marine Biological Association 2010)

Cribrilina punctata is easily confused with Collarina balzaci. According to Faasse and De Blauwe (2004) several observations of C. punctata had been wrongly identified in the past leading to the exclusion of C. punctata from the list of Dutch fauna. Moreover, Faasse et al. (2013) excluded specimens found on beached material.

Arachnidium fibrosum

In the Netherlands Arachnidium fibrosum had been observed before on empty shells in southern coastal waters of the North Sea at 5–10 m depth (De Blauwe 2009) and at the PAWF at 5, 10 and 17 m depth (Vanagt et al. 2013). This corresponds to our finding of the species at 10 m depth on Mytilus edulis. However, Vanagt et al. (2013) did not encounter the species on scour protection rocks at the bottom of the wind mill monopiles in contrast to our observation of A. fibrosum attached to rocks collected at 21 m and other observations on rocks from the Belgian Hinder Banks (Houziaux et al. 2008; De Blauwe 2009).

Both beached and offshore observations of A. fibrosum from the North Sea are relatively uncommon (Fig. 3) (Hayward 1985; De Blauwe 2009). Indeed, Faasse and De Blauwe (2004) emphasize the capability of A. fibrosum zooids to adhere sand and detritus to themselves, making it difficult to observe and identify the species. They suggest this would partly explain the low amount of observations in general. The species often stays unnoticed in preserved material, especially if Jassa spp. (Arthropoda, Malacostraca) tubes are present. Arachnidium fibrosum was extremely common on reef balls deployed in 2013 on the Bligh Bank and studied in 2014 (pers. comm. F. Kerckhof). Research on living material would facilitate the discovery and identification of this species in future research.
Fig. 3

Observations of Arachnidium fibrosum in the Netherlands (De Blauwe 2009; Vanagt et al. 2013), Belgium (Faasse and De Blauwe 2003; VLIZ 2007; Houziaux et al. 2008; De Blauwe 2009; pers. comm. F. Kerckhof), France (VLIZ 2007) and Germany (Kuhlenkamp and Kind 2012)

Electra monostachys

Electra monostachys has been observed several times on beached material along the Dutch coast and on shell banks around the Dutch Wadden Sea Islands (De Blauwe 2009). Observations in the entire North Sea reported both a more northern and southern distribution than our specimen (Fig. 4).
Fig. 4

Observations of Electra monostachys in the Netherlands (Faasse and De Blauwe 2004; De Blauwe 2009), Belgium (VLIZ 2007; De Blauwe 2009), Germany (De Kluijver 1991; Harms 1993; Kittelmann and Harder 2005; Kuhlenkamp and Kind 2012) and United Kingdom (Rees et al. 2005, Cooper et al., 1998; Joint Nature Conservation Committee, 2005; UK National Biodiversity Network: Marine Biological Association 2010)

Scruparia ambigua

Few observations of Scruparia ambigua exist for the Netherlands, and it is considered rare for the southern North Sea (De Blauwe 2009). In the Netherlands the most recent findings were at the PAWF (Vanagt et al. 2013) and the Borkum Reef Grounds (Coolen et al. 2015). In the current study the species was encountered at two platforms between 5 and 10 m depth, though Vanagt et al. (2013) observed the species several times at a slightly greater depth range (2–17 m). Several beached specimens have been reported as well (Fig. 5).
Fig. 5

Observations of Scruparia ambigua in the Netherlands (Faasse and De Blauwe 2004; NMR 2013; Vanagt et al. 2013; Coolen et al. 2015), Belgium (RBINS 1908; Vanhaelen et al. 2006; VLIZ 2007; Houziaux et al. 2008; De Blauwe 2009), France (VLIZ 2007), Germany (Senckenberg 2009; Kuhlenkamp and Kind 2012) and United Kingdom (Joint Nature Conservation Committee, 2005; UK National Biodiversity Network: Marine Biological Association 2010)

Scruparia chelata

Scruparia chelata has only recently been discovered in the Netherlands on a shipwreck (24 km off the coast of Texel) by Lengkeek et al. (2013b) who investigated ten shipwrecks on the Dutch continental shelf. Other observations of the species across the North Sea have been reported from more northerly and southerly locations than the Dutch specimens (Fig. 6). De Blauwe (2009) considered S. chelata as rare for the southern North Sea, although beached specimens, most likely originating from the English Channel, are common.
Fig. 6

Observations of Scruparia chelata in the Netherlands (Verkuil 1998; De Ruijter 2006; Lengkeek et al. 2013b; NMR 2013), Belgium (De Blauwe 2000, 2009; Vanhaelen et al. 2006; VLIZ 2007; Houziaux et al. 2008; Zintzen and Massin 2010), Germany (Harms 1993; Kuhlenkamp and Kind 2012) and United Kingdom (De Kluijver 1993; Joint Nature Conservation Committee, 2005; Marine Conservation Society, 2010)

Absence of Fenestrulina delicia

Fenestrulina delicia Winston, Hayward and Craig, 2000 is an invasive species that has been present in European waters since 2002 or earlier (Wasson and De Blauwe 2014). It was reported in the Shetlands, in Northern Ireland, on the west coast of Scotland, on both sides of the English channel, in the North Sea along the coast of Belgium, the Netherlands and Germany as far as Helgoland and along the west coast of the UK (De Blauwe et al. 2014; Wasson and De Blauwe 2014). A majority of the locations inhabited by F. delicia are wind farms and gas platforms. It is therefore noteworthy that F. delicia was absent in our samples.

More species to be expected

In this study six species were encountered mainly on M. edulis shells attached to the platform foundation while four species were found exclusively on the scour protection rocks at the seafloor. This indicates differences in preferred substrate and environmental conditions between bryozoan species. Some hard substrate areas on the Dutch continental shelf, such as the Texel Rough, remain uninvestigated. Moreover, bryozoan species known from empty shells on sandbanks on the Belgian and British continental shelf can be expected to be discovered also on Dutch sandbanks nearby (Faasse et al. 2013).

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This work was funded through the Wageningen UR TripleP@Sea Innovation programme (KB-14-007) and supported by GDF SUEZ E&P Nederland B.V., the Nederlandse Aardolie Maatschappij B.V., Wintershall Holding GmbH and EBN B.V. We are grateful to the staff of GDF SUEZ and the Bluestream dive team for their help during diving and sampling. The authors thank Naturalis Biodiversity Centre and the Natural History Museum Rotterdam for their cooperation in revising their specimens. We thank Britta Kind for her valuable comments on the manuscript and for providing data of several species records.

Authors’ contribuions

JCo designed the study, carried out the sampling and created the maps. JCo, EB and JL handled the samples in the lab and prepared them for taxonomic determination. EB, BW, JCu, HB and JL performed the taxonomic determination. EB collected data on observations of species at other locations and drafted the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Current address: Centre for Ocean Life, National Institute of Aquatic Resources (DTU Aqua), Technical University of Denmark
(2)
Wageningen University & Research, Chair Group of Aquatic Ecology and Water Quality Management
(3)
Maritime Department, Wageningen Marine Reseach
(4)
Department of Invertebrates, Royal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences
(5)
Van Hall Larenstein, Integrated Coastal Zone Management

References

  1. Coolen JWP, Bos OG, Glorius S, Lengkeek W, Cuperus J, Van der Weide BE, Agüera A. Reefs, sand and reef-like sand: a comparison of the benthic biodiversity of habitats in the Dutch Borkum Reef Grounds. J Sea Res. 2015;103:84–92.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Cooper KM, Boyd SE, Rees HL. Cross Sands broadscale survey 1998, Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture. Essex, UK: Burnham laboratory; 1998.Google Scholar
  3. De Blauwe H. Riemwiervoetjes en hun begroeiing. De Strandvlo. 2000;20:89–94.Google Scholar
  4. De Blauwe H. Mosdiertjes van de zuidelijke bocht van de Noordzee - Determinatiewerk voor België en Nederland. Oostende: Vlaams Instituut voor de Zee; 2009.Google Scholar
  5. De Blauwe H, Kind B, Kuhlenkamp R, Cuperus J, Van der Weide B, Kerckhof F. Recent observations of the introduced Fenestrulina delicia Winston, Hayward & Craig, 2000 (Bryozoa) in Western Europe. Studi Trentini di Scienze Naturali. 2014;94:45–51.Google Scholar
  6. De Kluijver MJ. Sublittoral hard substrate communities off Helgoland. Helgoländer Meeresuntersuchungen. 1991;45:317–44.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. De Kluijver MJ. Sublittoral hard-substratum communities off Orkney and St Abbs (Scotland). J Mar Biol Assoc UK. 1993;73:733–54.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. De Ruijter R. Naar het strand, of toch maar niet? Het Zeepaard. 2006;66:29–30.Google Scholar
  9. De Ruijter R. Cs-verslag. Het Zeepaard. 2014;74:38–45.Google Scholar
  10. Faasse M, De Blauwe H. Het mosdiertje Arachnidium fibrosum Hincks, 1880 nieuw voor België en Nederland. De Strandvlo. 2003;23:47–9.Google Scholar
  11. Faasse M, De Blauwe H. Faunistisch overzicht van de mariene mosdiertjes van Nederland (Bryozoa: Stenolaemata, Gymnolaemata). Nederlandse Faunistische Mededelingen. 2004;21:17–54.Google Scholar
  12. Faasse M, Van Moorsel GWNM, Tempelman D. Moss animals of the Dutch part of the North Sea and coastal waters of the Netherlands (Bryozoa). Nederlandse Faunistische Mededelingen. 2013;41:1–14.Google Scholar
  13. Glorius ST, Wijnhoven S, Kaag NHBM. Benthos community composition along pipeline trajectory A6-A-Ravn. An environmental baseline study. Den Helder: IMARES Wageningen UR; 2014. p. 49. Report Number C116.14.Google Scholar
  14. Harms J. Check list of species (algal, invertebrates and vertebrates) found in the vicinity of the island of Helgoland (North Sea, German Bight) - a review of recent records. Helgoländer Meeresuntersuchungen. 1993;47:1–34.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Hayward PJ. In: Brill EJ, Backhuys W, editors. Ctenostome Bryozoans. Synopsis of the British Fauna (new series). London: The Linnean Society of London; 1985.Google Scholar
  16. Hayward P, Ryland J. Cheilostomatous Bryozoa: 1. Aeteoidea - Cribrilinoidea: notes for the identification of British species. 2nd ed. Shrewsbury: Field Studies Council; 1998.Google Scholar
  17. Hayward P, Ryland J. Cheilostomatous Bryzoa: 2. Hippothooidea - Celleporoidea: notes for the identification of British species. 2nd ed. Shrewsbury: Field Studies Council; 1999.Google Scholar
  18. Houziaux JS, Kerckhof F, Degrendele K, Roche M, Norro A. The Hinder banks: yet an important region for the Belgian marine biodiversity? Brussels: Belgian Science Policy; 2008. p. 249. Report EV/45.Google Scholar
  19. Joint Nature Conservation Committee. Marine benthic dataset (version 1) commissioned by UKOOA. 2004. NBN Gateway. https://data.nbn.org.uk/Datasets/GA000182 [Accessed at 18 Aug 2015].Google Scholar
  20. Joint Nature Conservation Committee. Marine Nature Conservation Review (MNCR) and associated benthic marine data held and managed by JNCC. 2005. NBN Gateway. https://data.nbn.org.uk/Datasets/GA000190 [Accessed at 26 Jan 2016].Google Scholar
  21. Kittelmann S, Harder T. Species- and site-specific bacterial communities associated with four encrusting bryozoans from the North Sea, Germany. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol. 2005;327:201–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Kuhlenkamp R, Kind B. Makrozoobenthos Monitoring Helgoland 2011, Maßnahme im Rahmen der WRRL. Report of the State Agency for Agriculture. Germany: Nature and Rural Areas (LLUR) of Schleswig-Holstein; 2012. p. 55.Google Scholar
  23. Lengkeek W, Coolen JWP, Gittenberger A, Schrieken N. Ecological relevance of shipwrecks in the North Sea. Nederlandse Faunistische Mededelingen. 2013a;40:49–58.Google Scholar
  24. Lengkeek W, Didderen K, Dorenbosch M, Bouma S, Waardenburg H. Bureau Waardenburg bv and Stichting De Noordzee, rapport nr. 13–226, 76 ppx. Culemborg, Nethelands: Bureau Waardenburg bv and Stichting De Noordzee, rapport nr; 2013b. p. 13.Google Scholar
  25. Lindeboom HJ, Kouwenhoven HJ, Bergman MJN, Bouma S, Brasseur S, Fijn RC, De Haan D, Dirksen S, Van Hal R, Hille Ris Lambers R, Ter Hofstede R, Krijgsveld KL, Leopold M, Scheidat M. Short-term ecological effects of an offshore wind farm in the Dutch coastal zone; a compilation. Environ Res Lett. 2011;6:1–13.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Marine Conservation Society. Seasearch Marine Surveys. 2010. NBN Gateway. https://data.nbn.org.uk/Organisations/53 [Accessed at 18 Aug 2015].Google Scholar
  27. NMNH. ZMA.BRYO.95 Cribrilina punctata (Hassell, 1841). the Netherlands: National Museum of Natural History; 1949.Google Scholar
  28. NMNH. ZMA.BRYO.2073 Cribrilina punctata (Hassell, 1841). the Netherlands: National Museum of Natural History.Google Scholar
  29. NMR. NMR992800000029 Cribrilina punctata (Hassell, 1841). the Netherlands: Natural History Museum Rotterdam; 1992.Google Scholar
  30. NMR. Natural history museum Rotterdam, the Netherlands - Invertebrata miscellaneous Collection. 2013. http://www.gbif.org/dataset/7bb2d451-5ffa-4d58-bc7f-19ea7aecb201 [Accessed at 18 Aug 2015].Google Scholar
  31. NRM. Invertebrates Collection of the Swedish Museum of Natural History. 2010. http://www.gbif.org/dataset/56aa0680-0c60-11dd-84cd-b8a03c50a862 [Accessed at 18 Aug 2015].Google Scholar
  32. RBINS. G5004 Scruparia ambigua (d’Orbigny, 1841). Brussels, Belgium: Royal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences; 1908.Google Scholar
  33. Rees HL, Pendle MA, Waldock R, Limpenny D, Boyd SE. A comparison of benthic biodiversity in the North Sea, English Channel and Celtic Seas - Epifauna, Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science. Essex, UK: Burnham Laboratory; 2005.Google Scholar
  34. Schrieken N, Gittenberger A, Coolen JWP, Lengkeek W. Marine fauna of hard substrata of the Cleaver Bank and Dogger Bank. Nederlandse Faunistische Mededelingen. 2013;41:69–78.Google Scholar
  35. Schultze K, Janke K, Krüß A, Weidemann W. The macrofauna and macroflora associated with Laminaria digitata and L. hyperborea at the island of Helgoland (German Bight, North Sea). Helgoländer Meeresuntersuchungen. 1990;44:39–51.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Senckenberg. Collection Bryozoa SMF. 2009. http://www.gbif.org/dataset/966c9070-f762-11e1-a439-00145eb45e9a [Accessed at 18 Aug 2015].Google Scholar
  37. UK National Biodiversity Network: Marine Biological Association. Marine Biological Association - Marine survey data (Professional) held by MarLIN. 2010. http://www.gbif.org/dataset/cc2031d1-395d-4052-8ce1-796a08c3dbf2 [Accessed at 18 Aug 2015].Google Scholar
  38. Van Buuren J. Ecological survey of a North Sea gas leak. Mar Pollut Bull. 1984;15:305–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Van der Stap T, Coolen JWP, Lindeboom HJ. Marine fouling assemblages on Offshore Gas Platforms in the Dutch part of the North Sea: Effects of depth and distance from shore on biodiversity. PLoS One. 2015;11:e0146324. doi:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0146324.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Van Moorsel GWNM. Ecologie van de Klaverbank. BiotaSurvey 2002. Doorn: Ecosub; 2003. p. 157.Google Scholar
  41. Vanagt T, Van de Moortel L, Faasse M. Development of hard substrate fauna in the Princess Amalia Wind Farm. Oostende: eCOAST; 2013. p. 42. report 2011036.Google Scholar
  42. Vanhaelen M, Jonckheere I, De Blauwe H. Grote wierenstranding aan de Belgische Westkust tijdens de zomer van 2005. De Strandvlo. 2006;26:5–11.Google Scholar
  43. Verkuil J. CS-verslag. Het Zeepaard. 1998;58:150–7.Google Scholar
  44. VLIZ. Taxonomic Information Sytem for the Belgian coastal area (EurOBIS). 2007. http://www.gbif.org/dataset/83bb72ac-f762-11e1-a439-00145eb45e9a [Accessed at 18 Aug 2015].Google Scholar
  45. Wasson B, De Blauwe H. Two new records of cheilostome Bryozoa from British waters. Marine Biodiversity Records. 2014;7:1–4.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  46. WoRMS Editorial Board. World register of marine species. 2015.Google Scholar
  47. Zintzen V, Massin C. Artificial hard substrata from the Belgian part of the North Sea and their influence on the distributional range of species. Belg J Zool. 2010;140:20–9.Google Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s) 2016

Advertisement