- Marine Record
- Open Access
Records of five bryozoan species from offshore gas platforms rare for the Dutch North Sea
© The Author(s) 2016
- Received: 13 June 2016
- Accepted: 14 July 2016
- Published: 11 October 2016
This study reports on bryozoan species collected at three offshore gas platforms in the Dutch part of the North Sea. Four out of thirteen observed species are considered as rare in the Netherlands, whereas Cribrilina punctata is a new species for Dutch waters.
- North Sea
- Gas platform
- Cribrilina punctata
- Arachnidium fibrosum
- Electra monostachys
- Scruparia ambigua
- Scruparia chelata
The Dutch continental shelf of the North Sea largely consists of sandy bottoms. Rocky substrates are only present on the Cleaver Bank (Schrieken et al. 2013), the Borkum Reef Grounds (Coolen et al. 2015) and the Texel Rough (personal observation J.W.P. Coolen). Furthermore, artificial hard substrates are formed by shipwrecks (Lengkeek et al. 2013a), wind farms (Lindeboom et al. 2011; Vanagt et al. 2013) and gas platforms (Van Buuren 1984; Van der Stap et al. 2015).
Bryozoa grow on various hard substrates such as rocks, shells, wood, and plastic material, but also on macroalgae and Hydrozoa (De Blauwe 2009). Previous observations of Bryozoa in the Netherlands concentrated on southern coastal areas (Faasse and De Blauwe 2004). Faasse et al. (2013) recently reviewed the list of known Dutch Bryozoa which now comprises a total of 58 marine and estuarine species. They excluded specimens found on beached material, but included fauna from several recent offshore surveys of the Cleaver Bank (Van Moorsel 2003), the Princess Amalia Wind Farm (PAWF; Vanagt et al. 2013) and a shipwreck on the sandy Dogger Bank (Schrieken et al. 2013).
This article reports on the finding of 13 bryozoan species on three offshore gas platform in the Dutch part of the North Sea. Of these species, Cribrilina punctata is new to the Dutch fauna, and four species are considered rare to the Dutch waters.
Three offshore gas platforms were visited during several inventories in 2014 and 2015. The platforms differed in their distance from shore, depth at the seabed and year of construction
Distance from shore (km)
Maximum depth (m)
Year of construction
April and June 2014, October 2015
For identification Hayward and Ryland (1998), Hayward and Ryland (1999) and De Blauwe (2009) were consulted. The World Register of Marine Species (WoRMS Editorial Board 2015) was used as a taxonomic standard. Specimens were observed using a Zeiss SteREO Discovery.V8 stereomicroscope. When a specimen was covered by a thin layer of organic material which impeded observing the zooids, it was immersed in bleach for half an hour, then rinsed and dried in order to reveal the calcified skeleton.
Bryozoa species encountered on the platform legs and/or the scour protection rocks at the bottom of the platforms L10-G, L10-A and L15-A
Scour protection rocks
Arachnidium fibrosum a
Cribrilina punctata a
Electra monostachys a
Scruparia ambigua a
Scruparia chelata a
The ctenostomatous Arachnidium fibrosum was encountered in two samples taken from the foundation of platform L10-G at 10 m depth. Both colonies were attached to Mytilus edulis. Another colony of A. fibrosum was observed on a scour protection rock collected at the bottom of platform L15-A. Zooids were arranged in rows, and the colonies were sometimes branched.
A colony of Electra monostachys comprising several dozens of zooids was found on one of the scour protection rocks from platform L10-G. De Blauwe (2009) described a radiating crust as being characteristic for the species; this shape was also observed here. In addition to the relatively long proximal spine and pair of shorter distally located spines, almost all zooids still had their 4–6 pairs of shorter spines located around the frontal membrane.
Two members of the genus Scruparia were encountered. Scruparia ambigua was observed in one sample attached to M. edulis collected at 10 m depth at platform L10-G, but detached specimens were found as well. Several samples from platform L10-A taken between 5 and 15 m depth also contained a number of S. ambigua colonies. Scruparia chelata was observed at different depths (5–25 m) on platforms L10-G and L10-A, both as detached specimens and attached to M. edulis.
Cribrilina punctata is easily confused with Collarina balzaci. According to Faasse and De Blauwe (2004) several observations of C. punctata had been wrongly identified in the past leading to the exclusion of C. punctata from the list of Dutch fauna. Moreover, Faasse et al. (2013) excluded specimens found on beached material.
In the Netherlands Arachnidium fibrosum had been observed before on empty shells in southern coastal waters of the North Sea at 5–10 m depth (De Blauwe 2009) and at the PAWF at 5, 10 and 17 m depth (Vanagt et al. 2013). This corresponds to our finding of the species at 10 m depth on Mytilus edulis. However, Vanagt et al. (2013) did not encounter the species on scour protection rocks at the bottom of the wind mill monopiles in contrast to our observation of A. fibrosum attached to rocks collected at 21 m and other observations on rocks from the Belgian Hinder Banks (Houziaux et al. 2008; De Blauwe 2009).
Absence of Fenestrulina delicia
Fenestrulina delicia Winston, Hayward and Craig, 2000 is an invasive species that has been present in European waters since 2002 or earlier (Wasson and De Blauwe 2014). It was reported in the Shetlands, in Northern Ireland, on the west coast of Scotland, on both sides of the English channel, in the North Sea along the coast of Belgium, the Netherlands and Germany as far as Helgoland and along the west coast of the UK (De Blauwe et al. 2014; Wasson and De Blauwe 2014). A majority of the locations inhabited by F. delicia are wind farms and gas platforms. It is therefore noteworthy that F. delicia was absent in our samples.
More species to be expected
In this study six species were encountered mainly on M. edulis shells attached to the platform foundation while four species were found exclusively on the scour protection rocks at the seafloor. This indicates differences in preferred substrate and environmental conditions between bryozoan species. Some hard substrate areas on the Dutch continental shelf, such as the Texel Rough, remain uninvestigated. Moreover, bryozoan species known from empty shells on sandbanks on the Belgian and British continental shelf can be expected to be discovered also on Dutch sandbanks nearby (Faasse et al. 2013).
This work was funded through the Wageningen UR TripleP@Sea Innovation programme (KB-14-007) and supported by GDF SUEZ E&P Nederland B.V., the Nederlandse Aardolie Maatschappij B.V., Wintershall Holding GmbH and EBN B.V. We are grateful to the staff of GDF SUEZ and the Bluestream dive team for their help during diving and sampling. The authors thank Naturalis Biodiversity Centre and the Natural History Museum Rotterdam for their cooperation in revising their specimens. We thank Britta Kind for her valuable comments on the manuscript and for providing data of several species records.
JCo designed the study, carried out the sampling and created the maps. JCo, EB and JL handled the samples in the lab and prepared them for taxonomic determination. EB, BW, JCu, HB and JL performed the taxonomic determination. EB collected data on observations of species at other locations and drafted the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
- Coolen JWP, Bos OG, Glorius S, Lengkeek W, Cuperus J, Van der Weide BE, Agüera A. Reefs, sand and reef-like sand: a comparison of the benthic biodiversity of habitats in the Dutch Borkum Reef Grounds. J Sea Res. 2015;103:84–92.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Cooper KM, Boyd SE, Rees HL. Cross Sands broadscale survey 1998, Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture. Essex, UK: Burnham laboratory; 1998.Google Scholar
- De Blauwe H. Riemwiervoetjes en hun begroeiing. De Strandvlo. 2000;20:89–94.Google Scholar
- De Blauwe H. Mosdiertjes van de zuidelijke bocht van de Noordzee - Determinatiewerk voor België en Nederland. Oostende: Vlaams Instituut voor de Zee; 2009.Google Scholar
- De Blauwe H, Kind B, Kuhlenkamp R, Cuperus J, Van der Weide B, Kerckhof F. Recent observations of the introduced Fenestrulina delicia Winston, Hayward & Craig, 2000 (Bryozoa) in Western Europe. Studi Trentini di Scienze Naturali. 2014;94:45–51.Google Scholar
- De Kluijver MJ. Sublittoral hard substrate communities off Helgoland. Helgoländer Meeresuntersuchungen. 1991;45:317–44.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- De Kluijver MJ. Sublittoral hard-substratum communities off Orkney and St Abbs (Scotland). J Mar Biol Assoc UK. 1993;73:733–54.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- De Ruijter R. Naar het strand, of toch maar niet? Het Zeepaard. 2006;66:29–30.Google Scholar
- De Ruijter R. Cs-verslag. Het Zeepaard. 2014;74:38–45.Google Scholar
- Faasse M, De Blauwe H. Het mosdiertje Arachnidium fibrosum Hincks, 1880 nieuw voor België en Nederland. De Strandvlo. 2003;23:47–9.Google Scholar
- Faasse M, De Blauwe H. Faunistisch overzicht van de mariene mosdiertjes van Nederland (Bryozoa: Stenolaemata, Gymnolaemata). Nederlandse Faunistische Mededelingen. 2004;21:17–54.Google Scholar
- Faasse M, Van Moorsel GWNM, Tempelman D. Moss animals of the Dutch part of the North Sea and coastal waters of the Netherlands (Bryozoa). Nederlandse Faunistische Mededelingen. 2013;41:1–14.Google Scholar
- Glorius ST, Wijnhoven S, Kaag NHBM. Benthos community composition along pipeline trajectory A6-A-Ravn. An environmental baseline study. Den Helder: IMARES Wageningen UR; 2014. p. 49. Report Number C116.14.Google Scholar
- Harms J. Check list of species (algal, invertebrates and vertebrates) found in the vicinity of the island of Helgoland (North Sea, German Bight) - a review of recent records. Helgoländer Meeresuntersuchungen. 1993;47:1–34.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hayward PJ. In: Brill EJ, Backhuys W, editors. Ctenostome Bryozoans. Synopsis of the British Fauna (new series). London: The Linnean Society of London; 1985.Google Scholar
- Hayward P, Ryland J. Cheilostomatous Bryozoa: 1. Aeteoidea - Cribrilinoidea: notes for the identification of British species. 2nd ed. Shrewsbury: Field Studies Council; 1998.Google Scholar
- Hayward P, Ryland J. Cheilostomatous Bryzoa: 2. Hippothooidea - Celleporoidea: notes for the identification of British species. 2nd ed. Shrewsbury: Field Studies Council; 1999.Google Scholar
- Houziaux JS, Kerckhof F, Degrendele K, Roche M, Norro A. The Hinder banks: yet an important region for the Belgian marine biodiversity? Brussels: Belgian Science Policy; 2008. p. 249. Report EV/45.Google Scholar
- Joint Nature Conservation Committee. Marine benthic dataset (version 1) commissioned by UKOOA. 2004. NBN Gateway. https://data.nbn.org.uk/Datasets/GA000182 [Accessed at 18 Aug 2015].Google Scholar
- Joint Nature Conservation Committee. Marine Nature Conservation Review (MNCR) and associated benthic marine data held and managed by JNCC. 2005. NBN Gateway. https://data.nbn.org.uk/Datasets/GA000190 [Accessed at 26 Jan 2016].Google Scholar
- Kittelmann S, Harder T. Species- and site-specific bacterial communities associated with four encrusting bryozoans from the North Sea, Germany. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol. 2005;327:201–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kuhlenkamp R, Kind B. Makrozoobenthos Monitoring Helgoland 2011, Maßnahme im Rahmen der WRRL. Report of the State Agency for Agriculture. Germany: Nature and Rural Areas (LLUR) of Schleswig-Holstein; 2012. p. 55.Google Scholar
- Lengkeek W, Coolen JWP, Gittenberger A, Schrieken N. Ecological relevance of shipwrecks in the North Sea. Nederlandse Faunistische Mededelingen. 2013a;40:49–58.Google Scholar
- Lengkeek W, Didderen K, Dorenbosch M, Bouma S, Waardenburg H. Bureau Waardenburg bv and Stichting De Noordzee, rapport nr. 13–226, 76 ppx. Culemborg, Nethelands: Bureau Waardenburg bv and Stichting De Noordzee, rapport nr; 2013b. p. 13.Google Scholar
- Lindeboom HJ, Kouwenhoven HJ, Bergman MJN, Bouma S, Brasseur S, Fijn RC, De Haan D, Dirksen S, Van Hal R, Hille Ris Lambers R, Ter Hofstede R, Krijgsveld KL, Leopold M, Scheidat M. Short-term ecological effects of an offshore wind farm in the Dutch coastal zone; a compilation. Environ Res Lett. 2011;6:1–13.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Marine Conservation Society. Seasearch Marine Surveys. 2010. NBN Gateway. https://data.nbn.org.uk/Organisations/53 [Accessed at 18 Aug 2015].Google Scholar
- NMNH. ZMA.BRYO.95 Cribrilina punctata (Hassell, 1841). the Netherlands: National Museum of Natural History; 1949.Google Scholar
- NMNH. ZMA.BRYO.2073 Cribrilina punctata (Hassell, 1841). the Netherlands: National Museum of Natural History.Google Scholar
- NMR. NMR992800000029 Cribrilina punctata (Hassell, 1841). the Netherlands: Natural History Museum Rotterdam; 1992.Google Scholar
- NMR. Natural history museum Rotterdam, the Netherlands - Invertebrata miscellaneous Collection. 2013. http://www.gbif.org/dataset/7bb2d451-5ffa-4d58-bc7f-19ea7aecb201 [Accessed at 18 Aug 2015].Google Scholar
- NRM. Invertebrates Collection of the Swedish Museum of Natural History. 2010. http://www.gbif.org/dataset/56aa0680-0c60-11dd-84cd-b8a03c50a862 [Accessed at 18 Aug 2015].Google Scholar
- RBINS. G5004 Scruparia ambigua (d’Orbigny, 1841). Brussels, Belgium: Royal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences; 1908.Google Scholar
- Rees HL, Pendle MA, Waldock R, Limpenny D, Boyd SE. A comparison of benthic biodiversity in the North Sea, English Channel and Celtic Seas - Epifauna, Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science. Essex, UK: Burnham Laboratory; 2005.Google Scholar
- Schrieken N, Gittenberger A, Coolen JWP, Lengkeek W. Marine fauna of hard substrata of the Cleaver Bank and Dogger Bank. Nederlandse Faunistische Mededelingen. 2013;41:69–78.Google Scholar
- Schultze K, Janke K, Krüß A, Weidemann W. The macrofauna and macroflora associated with Laminaria digitata and L. hyperborea at the island of Helgoland (German Bight, North Sea). Helgoländer Meeresuntersuchungen. 1990;44:39–51.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Senckenberg. Collection Bryozoa SMF. 2009. http://www.gbif.org/dataset/966c9070-f762-11e1-a439-00145eb45e9a [Accessed at 18 Aug 2015].Google Scholar
- UK National Biodiversity Network: Marine Biological Association. Marine Biological Association - Marine survey data (Professional) held by MarLIN. 2010. http://www.gbif.org/dataset/cc2031d1-395d-4052-8ce1-796a08c3dbf2 [Accessed at 18 Aug 2015].Google Scholar
- Van Buuren J. Ecological survey of a North Sea gas leak. Mar Pollut Bull. 1984;15:305–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Van der Stap T, Coolen JWP, Lindeboom HJ. Marine fouling assemblages on Offshore Gas Platforms in the Dutch part of the North Sea: Effects of depth and distance from shore on biodiversity. PLoS One. 2015;11:e0146324. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0146324.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Van Moorsel GWNM. Ecologie van de Klaverbank. BiotaSurvey 2002. Doorn: Ecosub; 2003. p. 157.Google Scholar
- Vanagt T, Van de Moortel L, Faasse M. Development of hard substrate fauna in the Princess Amalia Wind Farm. Oostende: eCOAST; 2013. p. 42. report 2011036.Google Scholar
- Vanhaelen M, Jonckheere I, De Blauwe H. Grote wierenstranding aan de Belgische Westkust tijdens de zomer van 2005. De Strandvlo. 2006;26:5–11.Google Scholar
- Verkuil J. CS-verslag. Het Zeepaard. 1998;58:150–7.Google Scholar
- VLIZ. Taxonomic Information Sytem for the Belgian coastal area (EurOBIS). 2007. http://www.gbif.org/dataset/83bb72ac-f762-11e1-a439-00145eb45e9a [Accessed at 18 Aug 2015].Google Scholar
- Wasson B, De Blauwe H. Two new records of cheilostome Bryozoa from British waters. Marine Biodiversity Records. 2014;7:1–4.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- WoRMS Editorial Board. World register of marine species. 2015.Google Scholar
- Zintzen V, Massin C. Artificial hard substrata from the Belgian part of the North Sea and their influence on the distributional range of species. Belg J Zool. 2010;140:20–9.Google Scholar