Open Access

Notes on the genus Pterygosquilla Hilgendorf, 1890 (Stomatopoda: Squillidae) in Chile

Marine Biodiversity Records20169:47

https://doi.org/10.1186/s41200-016-0056-z

Received: 3 May 2016

Accepted: 6 June 2016

Published: 22 July 2016

Abstract

Background

Pterygosquilla is a large-size genus of the stomatopod family Squillidae. It contains four species of which two, P. armata (Milne Edwards H, Histoire naturelle des crustacés, comprenant l'anatomie, la physiologie et la classification de ces animaux 2, 1837) and P. gracilipes Miers, 1881, have been recorded in the Americas. Three subspecies of P. armata (P. armata armata, P. armata gracilipes, and P. armata capensis Manning, 1969 were recognised by Manning (Stomatopod Crustacea of the western Atlantic, 1969) but Ahyong (The Marine Fauna of New Zealand: Mantis shrimps (Crustacea: Stomatopoda); 125: 1-111, 2012) showed they should be separate species.

Methods

New material of Pterygosquilla armata was collected off the coast of Chile, in the eastern Pacific and was compared with previous descriptions available in the literature for P. armata, to the type material of Squilla gracilipes and to additional museum specimens of this species. Special attention was given to the lateral processes of the abdominal somites in both species.

Results

Four males and one female of P. armata collected off Quellón, Punta Lapa, Chile, were studied. They share several diagnostic characters with typical P. armata and also feature a previously unknown character: a remarkable, wing-like, thin lateral extension of abdominal pleura representing up to 50 % of the specimens total width. These extensions had been previously reported for the other American species, P. gracilipes, by Parisi (Elenco degli stomatopodi del Museo di Milano; 61:91-114, 1922). The type material of Squilla gracilipes, held at the Natural History Museum in London, however, lacks these lateral extentions, probably because it is a much smaller specimen.

Conclusions

The material reported from off Chile represents a wing-like form of P. armata in which the lateral processes of the abdominal pleura are strongly expanded.

Keywords

Stomatopods Chile Pterygosquilla

Background

The genus Pterygosquilla Hilgendorf, 1890 contains four nominal species (Ahyong 2012) and is represented in America by two species, both distributed in the southern cold-temperate water of the continent (Manning, 1969a). Pterygosquilla armata (H. Milne Edwards, 1837) is known from 44°S in Argentina (Atlantic Ocean) to Chile, while P. gracilipes (Miers, 1881) has so far been reported only off the coast of Chile (Manning 1969b). Both species were originally described within the genus Squilla Fabricius, 1787, and later transferred to Pterygosquilla Hilgendorf, 1890 (see Manning 1966, 1969, and Ahyong 2012 for further details related to recognition of Pterygosquilla).

Pterygosquilla armata was described for Argentina, south of 44°S, without illustrations, and was later reported from the eastern Pacific (coast of Chile as far north as Valparaiso) (see Manning 1969a). Pterygosquilla gracilipes was described on the basis of a young male specimen collected “… from the west coast of Patagonia …” (sic). A short description was provided together with an illustration of the telson and the last abdominal somite (Miers 1881: 75, plate VII, 8).

A specimen collected from an unknown locality was reported by Hilgendorf (1890) as Pterygosquilla laticauda Hilgendorf, 1890, and recognized later (Hansen 1895) as a subjective junior synonym of S. gracilipes (see Manning 1969a: 123). Hilgendorf was also responsible for the description of Pterygosquilla, of which P. laticauda is the type-species, and in which he included S. gracilipes. Subsequent material of P. gracilipes was recorded in 1922, when Bruno Parisi reported on five large males (TL 80 to 144 mm) in the collection of the Milano Museum, Italia, collected off Valparaiso, Chile (Parisi 1922).

In his report on stomatopods of the west coast of America, Schmitt (1940: 150, 151) included both species of Pterygosquilla (within the genus Squilla, thus ignoring Hilgendorf assignation to Pterygosquilla), but did not report on additional material. Schmitt (loc. cit.) did not refer to any other records of P. gracilipes after Parisi's note published in 1922. Bahamonde (1968) noted the presence of P. armata armata and P. gracilipes along the coast of Chile, provided distinctive features with P. armata for the latter, but did not report on new material examined either. Later, Manning (1971) proposed an identification key to species of Stomatopoda of the eastern Pacific, including a couplet for both species of Pterygosquilla.

New material belonging to Pterygosquilla was recently collected in southern Chile and is treated in this contribution.

Results and discussion

Order STOMATOPODA Latreille, 1817

Family SQUILLIDAE Latreille, 1802

Genus Pterygosquilla Hilgendorf, 1860

Pterygosquilla armata (H. Milne Edwards, 1837)

(Figs. 1, 2, 3)
Fig. 1

a Pterygosquilla armata (H. Milne Edwards, 1837), male (148 mm TL), dorsal view (ICML-EMU-7578). b-c Pterygosquilla gracilipes (Miers, 1881), male (80.5 mm TL) b and male (121.0 mm TL) c, dorsal view (MCSNM 2324). Scale in mm

Fig. 2

Pterygosquilla armata (H. Milne Edwards, 1837), male (148 mm TL) (ICML-EMU-7578) (a, c) and Pterygosquilla gracilipes (Miers, 1881), male (80.5 mm TL) (MCSNM 2324) (b, d). a, b Anterior region of carapace and eye (magnified) in dorsal view. c, d Dorsal view of posterior half of telson

Fig. 3

Squilla gracilipes Miers, 1881. Holotype male (NHM 80.30). a. Dorsal view of body. b. Dorsal view of carapace. c. Dorsal view of telson. Scale in mm

Restricted synonymy

Squilla armata H. Milne Edwards, 1837: 521; Bigelow, 1891: 94; 1894: 515, figures 9–10; A. Milne-Edwards, 1891: 53, plate 7; Parisi, 1922: 93; Schmitt, 1940: 150, figure 4; Manning, 1968: 123 (as a species included in Pterygosquilla).

Pterygosquilla armata.- Manning, 1969a: 123, figure 36; Bahamonde, 1968: 114, figure 5; Ahyong, 2012: 93 (key), 98–99 (passim).

Pterygosquilla armata armata.- Manning, 1971, 101 (key).

Material examined

Three males (TL 129–135 mm) and one female (TL 110 mm), off Quellón, Punta Lapa (43°08’22”S; 73° 36’29”W), Chile, 15/July/2005, 50 m, bottom trawl (coll. Marco Retamal) (MZUC 33510); one male (TL 165 mm), same date and locality (EMU-7578) (Fig. 1a).

Remarks

The material examined herein shares several diagnostic characters with typical P. armata: the abdominal submedian carinae are still visible as lighter marks, although very much more fainted (absent in P. gracilipes); the ventral side of the telson features a strong postanal keel (absent in P. gracilipes); strong, sharp spines are present on ocular scales (Fig. 2a) (reduced or obtuse in P. gracilipes; Fig. 2b); 1 (2) submedian denticles are present on the posterior margin of the telson (Fig. 2c) (vs. up to 26 in P. gracilipes; Fig. 2d. In addition, the cornea is less globulose, the eye more asymmetric in dorsal view in P. armata than in P. gracilipes, and the rostral plate is relatively wider at its base in P. armata (Fig. 2).

Specimens examined feature a remarkable lateral expansion of the abdominal pleura (Fig. 1). Manning (1969a, 1969b) noted that adult males of P. armata show secondary sexual characteristics that include inflated (swollen) margins of the telson and of the abdominal pleura between the intermediate and lateral carinae (also see Manning 1969b, Fig. 3c). In the case of our material, however, in addition to inflated margins of telson, the lateral expansions of all abdominal somites represent up to 50 % of the specimens total width and are wing-like, very thin extensions (Fig. 1; Table 1). Initially, these characteristics were quite puzzling and lead us to believe that this new material from Chile might belong to an undescribed species.
Table 1

Measurements of specimens of Pterygosquilla armata armata (H. Milne Edwards, 1837) collected off southern Chile during this study and of P. gracilipes (Miers, 1881) type and material kept in the Milano Museum

Spec.

Ref.

Sex

TL

CL

Telson W - L (W/L)

Abd. width (somite 2) Total-IC (ratio)

Teeth on dactylus L/R

Pterygosquilla armata armata

1

MZUC 33510

M

108

21

23.8-14.4 (1.65)

26.3-14.5 (1.81)

8/8

2

MZUC 33510

F

117

29

27.1-16.1 (1.68)

27.4-16.3 (1.68)

8/6

3

MZUC 33510

M

126

35

31.6-20.0 (1.58)

33.4-21.1 (1.58)

-/8

4

MZUC 33510

M

130

30

31.3-23.3 (1.34)

31.5-23.0 (1.37)

8/8

5

EMU-7578

M

148

33

37.9-29.4 (1.29)

45.4-21.8 (2.08)

8/9

Pterygosquilla gracilipes

6

Milano

M

121

25

25.5-22.3 (1.14)

40.7-16.1 (2.53)

10/10

 

(Wide form)

      

7

Milano

M

80.5

17

14.8-14.6 (1.01)

17.4-10.3 (1.69)

9/9

 

(Slender form)

      

8

Typea

M

89

18

16.0-15.0 (1.10)

17.9-11.1 (1.61)

10/10b

All measurements in mm. aMeasured from photographs. bFrom Miers (1881). IC, measured between intermediate carinae. L/R, left/right

We were not able to find a description of wing-like extensions of abdominal somites in P. armata. This feature has been reported for P. gracilipes (Miers, 1881) by Parisi (1922: 93) for three of the five males from off Valparaiso, Chile, he examined (called “forma larga”, or wide form, by Parisi by contrast to “forma estreta o normale”, normal or slender form presented by the two other specimens). Examination of a series of photographs of the holotype of Squilla gracilipes, held in very good condition at the Natural History Museum in London (NHM 80.30) (Fig. 3) (a male of TL ca 89 mm), allowed us to conclude that the wing-like lateral extension was not a feature of the type material. Two of the five specimens of P. gracilipes originally reported by Parisi (1922), still available at the Milano Museum (MCSNM 2324), were examined in August 2006 (Fig. 1). One of these two obviously belongs to the “forma larga”, or wide form, reported by Parisi (1922: 93, Fig. 1) and features remarkable wing-like expansion of the abdominal somites (see Fig. 1c). The jar containing Parisi’s material contains a note by the later Raymond Manning, indicating that he examined it and identified it as Pterygosquilla gracilipes. A search in Ray Manning’s notes at the Smithsonian museum indicates that he only examined two specimens (presumably the same we examined) when he visited the Milano Museum, but we were unable to find any reference to this fact in Manning's contributions.

Conclusions

For the reasons described above, particularly all the diagnostic characters included in the "Remarks" section, we conclude that the material reported herein from off Chile represents a wing-like form of P. armata armata in which the lateral processes of abdominal pleura are strongly expanded in large males, in a way similar to what has been reported for P. gracilipes by Manning (1969a, 1969b) and for P. schizodontia (Richardson, 1953) by Ahyong (2012).

Methods

During an exploratory cruise along the coast of southern Chile, one of us (MRR) collected a small series of large specimens that proved to belong to the genus Pterygosquilla. This material is reported herein and compared with the previous descriptions and reports of species of this genus, and compared with photographs of the type of P. gracilipes deposited in the Natural History Museum, London, Great Britain, and with specimens of this species still available at the Museo Civico di Storia Naturale, Milano, Italy. Ethics, consent and permissions have been followed in the manuscript. The material examined herein was collected within the frame of the Chilean Navy project CIMAR-FIORDOS, with the permission of the "Comité Oceanográfico Nacional", Chili.

Abbreviations

Abd., abdomen; CL, carapace length; ICML-EMU, Regional Collection of Invertebrates, Mazatlán, Mexico; L, length; MCSNM, Museo Civico di Storia Naturale de Milano; MZUC, Museo de Zoología, Universidad Católica, Chile; NHM, Natural History Museum; TL, total length; W, width.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Shane T. Ahyong for his useful comments and Mercedes Cordero for final editing of the manuscript. Photographs of the type of P. gracilipes were taken at the Museum of Natural History, London, UK. We thank the Museo Civico di Storia Naturale, Milano, Italy, for the loan of specimens of Pterygosquilla armata.

Authors’ contributions

MEH elaborated the first draft of the manuscript, reviewed the literature on the subject and examined the material held at the Museo Civico di Storia Naturale, Milano. MRR collected the material, made morphometric observations and measurements, and participate in the final edition of the manuscript. Both authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Authors' information

MEH is a senior scientist at the Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, and a specialist in taxonomy and ecology of marine invertebrates. MRR is a senior scientist at the Universidad de Concepción, Facultad de Ciencias Naturales y Oceanográficas, and a specialist in taxonomy and ecology of marine invertebrates.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Unidad Académica Mazatlán, Instituto de Ciencias del mar y Limnología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México
(2)
Facultad de Ciencias Naturales y Oceanográficas. Barrio Universitario S/N Casilla 160-C, Concepción, Universidad de Concepción

References

  1. Ahyong ST. The Marine Fauna of New Zealand: Mantis shrimps (Crustacea: Stomatopoda). NIWA Biodiversity Mem. 2012;125:1–111.Google Scholar
  2. Bahamonde N. Bosquejo taxonómico sobre los estomatópodos de Chile (Crustacea, Stomatopoda). Revista Universitaria, Universidad Católica de Chile. 1968;31:107–20.Google Scholar
  3. Bigelow RP. Preliminary notes on some new species of Squilla. Johns Hopkins Univ Circle. 1891;10:93–4.Google Scholar
  4. Bigelow RP. Scientific results of explorations by the U.S. Fish Commission Steamer “Albatross”. XXXII. Report on the Crustacea of the order Stomatopoda collected by the steamer “Albatross” Between 1885 and 1891, and on other specimens in the United States National Museum. Proc U S Natl Mus. 1894;17:489–550.Google Scholar
  5. Hansen HJ. Isopoden, cumaceen und stomatopoden der Planktonexpedition. Ergeb. Planktonexpedition Humboldt-Stiftung. 1895;2:1–105.Google Scholar
  6. Hilgendorf F. Eine neue stomatopoden-gattung Pterygosquilla Sber Ges Naturforsch Freunde. 1890:172–177.Google Scholar
  7. Manning RB. Notes on some Australian and New Zealand stomatopod Crustacea, with an account of the species collected by the Fisheries Investigation Ship Endeavour. Rec Aust Mus. 1966;27(4):79–137.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Manning RB. A revision of the family Squillidae (Crustacea, Stomatopoda), with the description of eight new genera. Bull Mar Sc. 1968;18(1):105–42.Google Scholar
  9. Manning RB. Stomatopod Crustacea of the western Atlantic. Studies in Tropical Oceanography 8. Coral Gables: University of Miami Press; 1969a.Google Scholar
  10. Manning RB. Notes on some stomatopod Crustacea from Southern Africa. Smithson Contrib Zool. 1969b;1:1–17.Google Scholar
  11. Manning RB. Eastern Pacific expeditions of the New York Zoological Society. Stomatopod Crustacea. Zoologica: Sci Contrib New York Zool Soc. 1971;56:95–113.Google Scholar
  12. Miers EJ. Crustacea. Proc Zool Soc London. 1881;1881:61–79.Google Scholar
  13. Milne Edwards H. Histoire naturelle des crustacés, comprenant l'anatomie, la physiologie et la classification de ces animaux 2. Paris: Librairie encyclopédique de Roret; 1837. 1834–1840.Google Scholar
  14. Milne-Edwards A. Crustacés. Mission Scientifique du Cap Horn, 1882–83, Zoologie, Crustacés, 6 (2 F). Paris, France: Gauthier-Villars et fils, editor. 1891. p. 1–76.Google Scholar
  15. Parisi B. Elenco degli stomatopodi del Museo di Milano. Atti Soc Ital Sci Nat. 1922;61:91–114.Google Scholar
  16. Schmitt WL. The Stomatopods of the west coast of America based on collections made by Allan Hancock Expeditions, 1933–38. Allan Hancock Pac Exped. 1940;5(4):129–225.Google Scholar

Copyright

© Hendrickx and Retamal 2016

Advertisement