Open Access

Heteromysis (Heteromysis) microps (Crustacea, Mysidae), a commensal species for Upogebia pusilla (Crustacea, Upogebiidae) in Arcachon Bay (NE Atlantic Ocean)

  • Nicolas Lavesque1, 2Email author,
  • Ludovic Pascal1, 2,
  • Benoit Gouillieux1, 2,
  • Jean-Claude Sorbe1, 2,
  • Guy Bachelet1, 2 and
  • Olivier Maire1, 2
Marine Biodiversity Records20169:14

https://doi.org/10.1186/s41200-016-0001-1

Received: 27 January 2016

Accepted: 8 February 2016

Published: 8 March 2016

Abstract

Background

The mysid Heteromysis (Heteromysis) microps is reported for the first time in the Bay of Biscay. During surveys carried out between March and September 2015 in Arcachon Bay, mysid specimens were fortuitously collected from Upogebia pusilla burrows.

Results

Details on morphology, colour pattern and behaviour of H. microps are provided.

Conclusions

Commensalism was frequently mentioned for Heteromysis species but never reported for H. microps. In this study, commensalism seems to be proved between the mysid and its host U. pusilla.

Keywords

Heteromysis (Heteromysis) microps Upogebia pusilla burrows Commensalism

Background

The thalassinidean mud shrimp Upogebia pusilla (Petagna, 1792) occurs in high densities in intertidal flats in the NE Atlantic and in shallow lagoons in the Mediterranean Sea. As its Y-shaped burrows penetrates deep into the sediment (up to 1 m), this shrimp is considered an important ecosystem engineer (Jones et al., 1994; Pillay and Branch, 2011). Indeed, through its intense bioturbation activity, it greatly influences sedimentary biogeochemical processes and enhances fluxes across the sediment-water interface with knock-on effects on the whole benthic communities (Ziebis et al., 1996; D’Andrea and DeWitt, 2009; Pascal et al., 2016). Upogebia also intensively ventilate their burrows through pleopod beating (Dworschak, 1981) for respiratory and trophic requirements (Sato et al., 2001). Deep and well irrigated mud-shrimp burrows represent efficient refuges against predation for a variety of commensal species such as shrimps (e.g. Betaeus longidactylus Lockington, 1877) (Campos et al., 2009), pea crabs (e.g. Scleroplax granulata Rathbun, 1894) (Campos, 2006), bivalves (e.g. Peregrinamor ohshimai Shôji, 1938) (Kato and Itani, 1995), polychaetes (e.g. Hesperonoe hwanghaiensis Uschakov & Wu, 1959) (Sato et al., 2001), phoronids (e.g. Phoronis pallida Silén, 1952) (Santaga, 2004) and goby fishes (e.g. Eutaeniichthys gilli Jordan & Snyder, 1901) (Henmi and Itani, 2014). During a recent study aiming at quantifying the influence of U. pusilla on porewater exchanges and nutrient cycling (Pascal et al., 2016), specimens of Heteromysis (Heteromysis) microps (G.O. Sars, 1877) were fortuitously collected in their burrows from tidal flats of Arcachon Bay, thus providing the opportunity for new observations on the morphology and behaviour of this rare species in European waters.

Results

Systematics

Family MYSIDAE Haworth, 1825

Subfamily Heteromysinae Norman, 1892

Genus Heteromysis S.I. Smith, 1873

Subgenus Heteromysis (Heteromysis) S.I Smith, 1873

Heteromysis (Heteromysis) microps (G.O. Sars, 1877)

Type species: Heteromysis (Heteromysis) formosa Smith, 1873

Material examined

For the 68 specimens of H. microps collected, size and sex were determined. The sex-ratio of the population was 2:3 (male:female). Brooding females were absent from March samples and represented 44.4 % and 60 % of the total females in July and September, respectively. The size range of individual body length BL was measured in each demographic category: 5.59–9.27 mm (7.42 ± 1.10 mm; x̄ ± s) in males, 5.27–8.73 mm (6.44 ± 0.84 mm) in females and 6.99–9.44 mm (8.07 ± 0.87 mm) in brooding females. Juveniles were never collected during our survey.

Generic diagnosis (according to Wittmann, 2000)

Heteromysinae with eyes normal. Appendix masculina representing a very small setose lobe or reduced to a setose ridge. Antennal scale usually short, setose all around, without or with a small apical article. Mouthparts normal; labrum not produced into a spiniform process. First thoracic endopod with a large endite on the basis, and smaller endites on ischium and merus (an additional small, conical endite may be present on the coxa, although rarely noted by previous authors). Third thoracic endopod subchela-like (gnathopod), with enlarged carpopropodus and strong dactylus. Carpopropodus of fourth to eighth thoracic endopods with 3–7 articles. Penis long and more or less cylindrical. Pleopods entire, reduced to small plates in both sexes; non-dimorphic (subgenus Heteromysis) or dimorphic (some other subgenera). Uropods normal, entire; exopod with setae all around; endopod without or in most species with stout setae along inner margin. Telson with stout setae on lateral margins; distinct apical cleft present, margins of cleft with a number of laminae.

Description

Based on two males (Arcachon Marine Station Collection), BL = 7.52 mm and 7.89 mm, Arcachon Bay, March 2015.

Antennal scale small, shorter than antennular peduncle. Sternal processes absent in females, present on second to eighth sternites in males: first anterior one with blunt bifid apex, subsequent ones with more or less acute bifid tip and the last posterior one very reduced and cone-shaped (Fig. 1a). Endopod of thoracopod 3 (gnathopod) very robust, longer than cephalothorax, non-dimorphic; merus large, bearing 12 cuspidate setae on ventral margin of inner face (from 11 to 16 for other specimens), 9 cuspidate setae on ventral margin of outer face (from 8 to 11 for other specimens), 1 sub-distal seta on dorsal margin (Fig. 1b), ventrodistal part with an inner roundish lobe and an outer acute lobe between which carpopropodus folds down; carpopropodus with one pair of cuspidate setae at ventrodistal angle between which dactylus bends down to form a powerful subchela; dactylus with 3 long, tip-curved setae along outer face (Fig. 1b). Pleopods normal, non-dimorphic. Telson cleft, with 1 stout seta on basal third of lateral margin, followed by a naked portion and then 9 stout setae on distal half (7 to 10 stout setae on other specimens) (Fig. 1c). Uropod endopod with 1 stout seta on proximal part of inner margin, near statocyst (Fig. 1d).
Fig. 1

Adult males of Heteromysis (Heteromysis) microps (G.O. Sars, 1877) from Arcachon Bay (Arcachon Marine Station collection: A: male, BL = 7.89 mm; B-D: male, BL = 7.52 mm). a lateral view. SP1: first sternal process; SP6: sixth sternal process; GA: genital appendage; b right thoracopod 3 endopod, inner view; c telson, ventral view; d right uropod, ventral view. Scale bars: 0.5 mm

Remarks (based on Sars (1877) and Tattersall and Tattersall (1951))

Sars (1877) described only adult females and Tattersall and Tattersall (1951) described only a single adult male. All the data on females given by the last authors were depicted from Sars (1877).
  • Telson:

Tattersall and Tattersall (1951) re-described H. microps with a telson armed with 12-14 stout setae on each side. The Arcachon specimens show no more than 11 stout setae (one near the base and 10 on the distal half) as first described by Sars (1877) in the original description of H. microps.
  • Thoracopod 3:

All the Arcachon specimens bear 3 long setae on their dactylus. Tattersall and Tattersall (1951) mentioned the presence of two subdistal pairs of small stout setae as well as a pair of distal finger-like projections along the ventral margin of the carpopropodus (proximal article). However, in Sars’s original description of this species (1877; Fig. 20-9), the subdistal stout setae are clearly more developed and the ‘distal finger-like projections’ are in fact represented as a pair of articulated stout setae (shorter than the other ones). Our own observations on Arcachon specimens confirm Sars’s original interpretation (a pair of distal stout setae, not finger-like projections), but without two pairs of stout setae along the carpopropodus inner margin (rarely with one short pair). Tattersall and Tattersall (1951) mentioned the presence of 10 sensitive stout pedestal setae (probably 12 of these setae in Sars’s original description) and one distal setal tuft along the merus inner margin. Such a setal tuft was not observed in Arcachon specimens and 11–16 sensitive stout pedestal setae were counted on their merus inner margin. Furthermore, setal ornamentation shows some slight differences between right and left thoracopod 3 endopods, when considering a single specimen.

Coloration

As the specimens were observed alive after capture, new data on their colour pattern can be provided. General appearance orange (Fig. 2a). Cornea brown-golden, surrounded by pink-red coloration (Fig. 2b). Eyes and antennae iridescent (Fig. 2b). Cephalon rust-coloured (Fig. 2a). Rust-coloured chromatophores scattered dorsally and laterally over carapace and between 6th abdominal segment and telson. Appendages and uropods not pigmented. Eggs brown. The body coloration disappeared within a few minutes after fixation (alcohol or formalin).
Fig. 2

Living male specimen of Heteromysis (Heteromysis) microps (G.O. Sars, 1877) from Arcachon Bay (BL = 7.52 mm) (Arcachon Marine Station collection, same specimen as in Fig. 1b-d). a lateral view; b anterior part

Geographical distribution and habitat

Relatively rare species, from Norwegian coast to Mediterranean Sea (Tattersall and Tattersall 1951; Tattersall, 1967; Dauvin and Vallet, 1997). In coastal areas, from 6 to 33 m depth, on mud to pebble bottoms (Zouhiri et al., 1998), Posidonia oceanica (Linnaeus) Delile, 1813 meadows (Wittmann, 2001) and, according to the present study, within burrows of U. pusilla in intertidal Zostera noltei meadows.

Discussion

The genus Heteromysis is divided in 4 subgenera and is the most speciose of the Mysidae with 82 species currently considered valid (Mees, 2015). Only one species was previously mentioned from the southern Bay of Biscay: Heteromysis (Heteromysis) norvegica G.O. Sars, 1882, on bathyal bottoms (Frutos and Sorbe, 2014). Members of this genus are generally distributed in coastal warm-water regions and most of the species are restricted to small geographical areas (Fukuoka, 2005). This study reports on the first record of H. microps in the Bay of Biscay, and most importantly, its first record in association with another invertebrate species. Despite an important number of macrobenthic studies since the 1960s in Arcachon Bay (see Blanchet, 2004) and particularly in Z. noltei meadows (Blanchet et al., 2004), H. microps was never found in that bay. Therefore, this mysid should not be considered as a new inhabitant of Arcachon Bay, and its absence in previous ecological studies can be explained by the lack of specific investigations on Upogebia pusilla burrows before 2015. H. microps is probably commensal with this burrowing shrimp. As it usually occurs on soft bottoms (Zouhiri et al., 1998) and in seagrass meadows (Wittmann, 2001), the association found in this study could be a local phenomenon.

Coastal mysids, and particularly species belonging to the genus Heteromysis, are known to prefer complex habitats such as dense vegetation, shells and gravels or to live in association with different invertebrate species (Wittmann, 2008). Commensalism in the genus Heteromysis was first demonstrated by Clarke (1955), describing an association between Heteromysis actiniae Clarke, 1955 and the sea-anemone Bartholomea annulata (Lesueur, 1817) in Bahamas Islands (Tattersall, 1967). Heteromysis species are known to have various hosts like sponges, corals, gorgonians, sea anemones, brittle stars and hermit crabs inhabiting empty shells (Wittmann, 2008; Wittmann et al., 2014). In Arcachon Bay, Upogebia burrows provide peculiar microhabitats where mysids can live more safely against predation and environmental perturbations as well as against desiccation at low tide.

According to Dworschak (1987), U. pusilla is primarily a filter-feeding species, generating a water flow into its burrow by pleopods beating. Astall et al. (1997) demonstrated that the mean irrigation rate into the burrows of Upogebia deltaura (Leach, 1815) and U. stellata (Montagu, 1808) were 149.5 ml.h−1 and 139.7 ml.h−1, respectively. The suspended material associated with water flow is driven to the “basket” formed by the long setae beared by pereopods 1-2, then transferred to the mouthparts by maxilliped 3 (Dworschak, 2004). As H. microps is a suspension feeder (Mees, 2016), this species could take advantage of the particle flow generated by the Upogebia host within its burrow. This nutritional model has been previously reported by Vannini et al. (1994) for Heteromysis (Gnathomysis) harpax (Hilgendorf, 1878). This latter species is associated with hermit crabs belonging to the genus Dardanus Paul’son, 1875 and ingests suspended particles brought into the gill chamber by the host. According to Dworschak (1987), U. pusilla is also a deposit feeder via a ‘gardening’ behaviour. Indeed, this decapod can actively store detritus and plant fragments in the walls of its burrow, consuming them with their associated microflora. Mysids are also able to pick up detritus particles with their anterior thoracopods (Albertson, 2004). Unexpectedly, the huge thoracopod 3 of H. microps (a morphological peculiarity of this genus) does not appear to be related to a predator behaviour but could be used to consume the organic particles stored in Upogebia burrows. Furthermore, San Vicente and Monniot (2014) suggested that the enlarged thoracopod endopods of Heteromysinae could be used as weapons. With the adoption of a symbiotic life in these taxa, it is suggested that these weaponries probably have played an important role in determining the behaviour and morphological evolution of such mysids (Vannini et al. 1994).

Conclusions

In this study, commensalism seems to be proved between the mysid and its host. As the mysid associate remains external and was never found in another habitat in Arcachon Bay, the association between H. microps and U. pusilla may be classified as obligatory ectocommensalism (Nardon and Charles, 2002; San Vicente and Monniot, 2014). H. microps seems to take advantage of the filter feeding and the gardening behaviour of U. pusilla. Furthermore, H. microps is clearly protected from predators within U. pusilla burrows.

Further studies will be conducted to understand the behaviour of both species (laboratory experiments in thin aquariums, each colonized by one U. pusilla specimen). These mesocosm observations will allow answering different questions: (1) what is the behaviour of mysids during night time? Indeed, Heteromysis species become actively pelagic at night while they live sheltered during daytime (Tattersall, 1967; Wittmann, 2008); (2) are mysids able to breed within Upogebia burrows, thereby benefiting from some protection for their offspring?; (3) are mysids expulsed from burrows during the breeding period of U. pusilla?

Methods

Study area

Arcachon Bay is a 180-km2 macrotidal coastal lagoon (maximum tidal range: 4.9 m) located on the south-western coast of France (Fig. 3). This lagoon is connected with the Atlantic Ocean by a narrow channel and receives freshwater inputs in its south-eastern part (Leyre River). It is characterized by large intertidal flats (115 km2), the lower parts of which are used for cupped oyster [Crassostrea gigas (Thunberg, 1793)] farming. Most of the intertidal area (46.2 km2) is covered by seagrass beds, Zostera noltei Hornemann, 1832 (Plus et al., 2010). In the inner lagoon, tidal channels represent an area of 71 km2, with 1.02 km2 occupied by eelgrass beds, Zostera marina Linnaeus, 1753 (Plus et al., 2010).
Fig. 3

Sampling site (“Le Navire Brûlé”) of Heteromysis (Heteromysis) microps (G.O. Sars, 1877) in Arcachon Bay (SW France)

Material examined

During surveys carried out between March and September 2015, 68 mysid specimens were fortuitously collected from Upogebia pusilla burrows (0-1 individual per burrow), using a bait piston pump and later on identified as H. microps according to the identification key published by Wittmann (2008) for Atlantico-Mediterranean species. Sampling was carried out at low tide within a homogeneous patch of Z. noltei at “Navire Brûlé” site (temperature from 7 to 21 °C, salinity from 21.9 to 32.8) (Fig. 3). All specimens were examined under a Nikon SMZ25 stereomicroscope and photographed with a Nikon DS-Ri 2 camera, after anaesthetizing them with magnesium chloride (MgCl2). An image of one specimen was drawn with a Wacom Intuos 5 tablet, using Inkscape software (v.0.48). Body length BL was measured with the NIS-Elements Analysis software from the rostrum anterior margin to the telson apex.

Availability of supporting data

Five specimens from Arcachon Bay were deposited in the Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle, Paris (MNHN-IU-2014-10181).

Declarations

Acknowledgments

Authors thank F. Prince and P. Dusoewoir, captain and crew member of R/V Planula IV for help during field work. They also thank three anonymous reviewers for helpful comments on the manuscript. This work is part of Ludovic Pascal’s doctoral thesis (University of Bordeaux) financed by a PhD fellowship from the French “Ministère de l’Enseignement Supérieur et de la Recherche”. This study has been carried out in the framework of the Cluster of Excellence COTE and was financially supported by the UPO (EC2CO-DRIL) project.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
University Bordeaux, EPOC, UMR 5805, Station Marine d’Arcachon
(2)
CNRS, EPOC, UMR 5805, Station Marine d’Arcachon

References

  1. Albertson J. Trophic interactions involving mysid shrimps (Mysidacea) in the near-bottom habitat in the Baltic Sea. Aquat Ecol. 2004;38:457–69. doi:10.1023/B:AECO.0000035163.30037.38.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Astall CM, Taylor AC, Atkinson JA. Behavioural and physiological implications of a burrow-dwelling lifestyle for two species of upogebiid mud-shrimp (Crustacea: Thalassinidea). Estuar Coast Mar Sci. 1997;44:155–68. doi:10.1006/ecss.1996.0207.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Blanchet H. Structure et fonctionnement des peuplements benthiques du bassin d’Arcachon. Bordeaux: University of Bordeaux; 2004.Google Scholar
  4. Blanchet H, de Montaudouin X, Lucas A, Chardy P. Heterogeneity of macrozoobenthic assemblages within a Zostera noltii seagrass bed: diversity, abundance, biomass and structuring factors. Estuar Coast Mar Sci. 2004;61:111–23. doi:10.1016/j.ecss.2004.04.008.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Campos E. Systematics of the genus Scleroplax Rathbun, 1893 (Crustacea: Brachyura: Pinnotheridae). Zootaxa. 2006;1344:33–41.Google Scholar
  6. Campos E, De Campos AR, Manriquez I. Intertidal thalassinidean shrimps (Thalassinidea, Callianassidae and Upogebiidae) of the west coast of Baja California, Mexico: Annotated checklist, key for identification, and symbionts. Crustaceana. 2009;82:1249–63. doi:10.1163/001121609X12481627024454.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Clarke WD. A new species of the genus Heteromysis (Crustacea, Mysidacea) from the Bahama Islands, commensal with a sea-anemone. Am Mus Novit. 1955;1716:1–13.Google Scholar
  8. D’Andrea AF, DeWitt TH. Geochemical ecosystem engineering by the mud shrimp Upogebia pugettensis (Crustacea: Thalassinidae) in Yaquina Bay, Oregon: Density-dependent effects on organic matter remineralization and nutrient cycling. Limnol Oceanogr. 2009;54:1911–32. doi:10.4319/lo.2009.54.6.1911.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Dauvin JC, Vallet C. Apports d’échantillonnages suprabenthiques à la faunistique de la Manche et à la biogéographie du plateau continental nord-ouest européen. Crustacés et Pycnogonides. Cah Biol Mar. 1997;38:251–66.Google Scholar
  10. Dworschak PC. The pumping rates of the burrowing shrimp Upogebia pusilla (Petagna) (Decapoda: Thalassinidea). J Exp Mar Biol Ecol. 1981;52:25–35.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Dworschak PC. Feeding behavior of Upogebia pusilla and Callianassa tyrrhena (Crustacea, Decapoda, Thalassinidea). Invest Pesq. 1987;51:421–29.Google Scholar
  12. Dworschak PC. Biology of Mediterranean and Caribbean Thalassinidea (Decapoda). In: Tamaki A, editor. Proceedings of the Symposium “Ecology of large bioturbators in tidal flats and shallow sublittoral sediments – from individuals behavior to their role as ecosystem engineers”. Nagasaki: Nagasaki University; 2004. p. 15–22.Google Scholar
  13. Frutos I, Sorbe JC. Bathyal suprabenthic assemblages from the southern margin of the Capbreton Canyon (“Kostarrenkala” area), SE Bay of Biscay. Deep Sea Res II. 2014;102:291–309. doi:10.1016/j.dsr2.2013.09.010.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Fukuoka K. A new species of Heteromysis (Mysida, Mysidae) associated with sponges, from the Uraga Channel, Central Japan, with notes on distribution and habitats within the genus Heteromysis. Crustaceana. 2005;77:1353–73. doi:10.1163/1568540043165976.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Henmi Y, Itani G. Burrow utilization in the goby Eutaeniichthys gilli associated with the mud shrimp Upogebia yokoyai. Zool Sci. 2014;31:523–28.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Jones CG, Lawton JH, Shachak M. Organisms as ecosystem engineers. Oikos. 1994;69:373–86.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Kato M, Itani G. Commensalism of a bivalve, Peregrinamor ohshimai, with a thalassinidean burrowing shrimp, Upogebia major. J Mar Biol Assoc UK. 1995;75:941–47. doi:10.1017/S0025315400038261.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Mees J. Heteromysis. In: Mees, J. and Meland K. (Eds) (2012 onwards) World List of Lophogastrida, Stygiomysida and Mysida. World Register of Marine Species. 2015. http://marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=119863. Accessed 27 Jul 2015.
  19. Mees J. Heteromysis (Heteromysis) microps. In: Mees, J. and Meland K. (Eds) (2012 onwards) World List of Lophogastrida, Stygiomysida and Mysida. World Register of Marine Species. 2016. http://marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=120037. Accessed 3 Jan 2016.
  20. Nardon P, Charles H. Morphological aspects of symbiosis. In: Seckbach J, editor. Symbiosis: Mechanisms and Systems. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 2002. p. 15–44.Google Scholar
  21. Pascal L, Maire O, Volkenborn N, Lecroart P, Bichon S, de Montaudouin X, Grémare A, Deflandre B. Influence of the mud shrimp Upogebia pusilla (Decapoda: Gebiidea) on solute and porewater exchanges in an intertidal seagrass (Zostera noltei) meadow of Arcachon Bay: An experimental assessment. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol. 2016;477:69–79. doi:10.1016/j.jembe.2016.01.008.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Pillay D, Branch GM. Bioengineering effects of burrowing thalassinidean shrimps on marine soft-bottom ecosystems. Oceano Mar Biol. 2011;49:137–92.Google Scholar
  23. Plus M, Dalloyau S, Trut G, Auby I, de Montaudouin X, Emery E, Noel C, Viala C. Long-term evolution (1988-2008) of Zostera spp. meadows in Arcachon Bay (Bay of Biscay). Estuar Coast Shelf Sci. 2010;87:357–66. doi:10.1016/j.ecss.2010.01.016.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. San Vicente C, Monniot F. The ascidian-associated mysid Corellamysis eltanina gen.nov., sp.nov. (Mysida, Mysidae, Heteromysinae): a new symbiotic relationship from the Southern Ocean. Zootaxa. 2014;3780:323–46. http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3780.2.6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Santaga A. Waterborne behavioral cue for the actinotroch larva of Phoronis pallida (Phoronida) produced by Upogebia pugettensis (Decapoda: Thalassinidea). Biol Bull. 2004;207:103–15.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Sars GO. Nye bidrag til Kundskaben om Middelhavets Invertebratfauna: I. Middelhavets Mysider. Arch Math Naturvid. 1877;2:10–119. Tabs 1-36.Google Scholar
  27. Sato M, Uchida H, Itani G, Yamashita H. Taxonomy and life history of the scale worm Hesperonoe hwanghaiensis (Polychaeta: Polynoidae), newly recorded in Japan, with special reference to commensalism to a burrowing shrimp, Upogebia major. Zool Sci. 2001;18:981–91. doi:10.2108/zsj.18.981.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Tattersall OS. A survey of the genus Heteromysis (Crustacea: Mysidacea) with descriptions of five new species from tropical coastal waters of the Pacific and Indian Oceans, with a key for the identification of the known species of the genus. Trans Zool Soc London. 1967;31:157–93.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Tattersall WM, Tattersall OS. The British Mysidacea. London: The Ray Society; 1951.Google Scholar
  30. Vannini M, Ruwa RK, Innocenti G. Notes on the behavior of Heteromysis harpax, a commensal mysid living in hermit crab shells. Ethol Ecol Evol. 1994;3:137–42.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Wittmann KJ. Heteromysis arianii sp. n., a new benthic mysid (Crustacea, Mysidacea) from coralloid habitats in the Gulf of Naples (Mediterranean Sea). Ann Nat Hist Mus Wien. 2000;102:279–90.Google Scholar
  32. Wittmann KJ. Centennial changes in the near-shore mysid fauna of the Gulf of Naples (Mediterranean Sea), with description of Heteromysis riedli sp. n. (Crustacea, Mysidacea). Mar Ecol. 2001;22:85–109.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Wittmann KJ. Two new species of Heteromysini (Mysida: Mysidae) from the island of Madeira (N.E. Atlantic), with notes on sea anemone and hermit crab commensalisms in the genus Heteromysis S.I. Smith, 1873. Crustaceana. 2008;81:351–74. doi:10.1163/156854008783564037.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Wittmann KJ, Ariani AP, Lagardère JP. Chapter 54. Orders Lophogastrida Boas, 1883, Stygiomysida Tchindonova, 1981, and Mysida Boas, 1883 (also known collectively as Mysidacea). In: Vaupel Klein JC, von Charmantier-Daures M, Schram FR, editors. Treatise on Zoology - Anatomy, Taxonomy, Biology. The Crustacea. Revised and updated, as well as extended from the Traité de Zoologie [founded by P.-P. Grassé], Volume 4 Part B. Leiden: Brill; 2014. p. 189–396.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Ziebis W, Forster S, Huettel M, Jørgensen BB. Complex burrows of the mud shrimp Callianassa truncata and their geochemical impact in the sea bed. Nature. 1996;382:619–22.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Zouhiri S, Vallet C, Mouny P, Dauvin JC. Spatial distribution and biological rhythms of suprabenthic mysids from the English Channel. J Mar Biol Assoc UK. 1998;78:1181–202.View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s) 2016