Open Access

Medusae and ctenophores from the Bahía Blanca Estuary and neighboring inner shelf (Southwest Atlantic Ocean, Argentina)

  • M. Sofía Dutto1, 2Email author,
  • Gabriel N. Genzano1, 3, 4,
  • Agustín Schiariti1, 3, 5,
  • Julieta Lecanda6, 7,
  • Mónica S. Hoffmeyer1, 2, 8 and
  • Paula D. Pratolongo1, 2, 9
Marine Biodiversity Records201710:14

DOI: 10.1186/s41200-017-0114-1

Received: 17 September 2015

Accepted: 17 January 2017

Published: 12 May 2017

Abstract

An updated checklist of medusae and ctenophores is presented for the first time for the area comprised by the Bahía Blanca Estuary, the adjacent shelf El Rincón and Monte Hermoso beach, on the southwest coast of Buenos Aires province (Argentina). The area is highly productive and provides several ecosystem services including fishing and tourism. Updated information on the biodiversity of medusae and ctenophores species is essential for the study area, given that these species can affect ecosystem services. The list includes 23 hydromedusae, 3 scyphomedusae, and 3 ctenophores. Five hydromedusae (Halitiara formosa, Amphinema dinema, Aequorea forskalea, Clytia lomae and Halopsis ocellata) were firstly observed in this area. Three species of medusae, 2 hydromedusae (Olindias sambaquiensis and Liriope tetraphylla) and 1 scyphomedusae (Chrysaora lactea) pose a potential health risk, due to their toxicity to humans. Considering the size of the study area, the Bahía Blanca region has a comparatively high species richness of hydromedusae, higher than larger zones previously studied along the temperate SW Atlantic Ocean. The present report provides the baseline knowledge of gelatinous species for the Bahía Blanca region.

Keywords

Gelatinous species Composition Richness Coastal ecosystem South America

Introduction

Our knowledge of gelatinous fauna (medusae and ctenophores particularly) in the Argentine Sea has been much enhanced since major contributions by Ramírez and Zamponi (1981), Bouillon (1999), Mianzan (1999), Mianzan and Cornelius (1999), Genzano et al. (2008a) and Rodriguez (2012). However, the Bahía Blanca Estuary and its neighboring inner shelf is a still largely understudied area, in spite of the widely recognized ecosystem services that these coastal waters provide, such as wildlife support (Delhey and Petracci 2004; Hoffmeyer et al. 2009; Guinder et al. 2013) and fisheries production (Carozza and Fernández Aráoz 2009), as well as nutrient cycling and amelioration of heavy metal pollution (Negrin et al. 2016). These coastal waters are intensely used for fishing, recreational purposes, and provide space for industrial, port and commercial activities (Acha et al. 2004; Pizarro and Piccolo 2008). Several species of medusae and ctenophores have been reported in the region (Ramírez and Zamponi 1980; Hoffmeyer and Mianzan 2004), including species which may exert considerable predation pressure on fishing resources, mainly through consumption of larvae and juveniles, as well as competition for food (Mianzan and Sabatini 1985; Mianzan 1986a; Hoffmeyer 1990). Medusae species of public health concern such as Olindias sambaquiensis and Liriope tetraphylla have also been reported in high concentrations (Mianzan and Ramírez 1996; Mianzan et al. 2000, 2001). Species composition and ecological studies on medusae and ctenophores in the Bahía Blanca region were mainly conducted in the 1980’s (Mianzan and Sabatini 1985; Zamponi and Mianzan 1985; Mianzan 1986a, 1986b, 1989a, 1989b, 1989c; Mianzan and Zamponi 1988; Hoffmeyer 1990), but discontinued afterwards.

Given the potential impacts of gelatinous species on valuable ecosystem services, updated information on their biodiversity in the study area is essential. This work aims at compiling information on the species composition of medusae and ctenophores in the Bahía Blanca Estuary and its neighboring inner shelf. To do so, we considered earlier faunal lists and own unpublished data from plankton surveys.

Materials and methods

Study area

The study area is located in a temperate, semiarid zone in the southwestern Atlantic, Argentina (38°30′ - 41°S, ~60°W) (Fig. 1). According to the biogeographic division of the Argentine Sea based on its marine fauna (Balech and Ehrlich 2008), the study area represents the transition between the Rionegrine and Uruguayan Districts of the Argentine Province. In this work, we considered information on the biodiversity of medusa and ctenophore species from the Bahía Blanca Estuary (BBE), the associated sandy beaches of Monte Hermoso (MH) located north of the estuary, and the adjacent shelf El Rincón (ER) (Fig. 1). The BBE is a shallow, funnel shaped system, oriented NW/SE. The estuarine area comprises a dense arrangement of meandering channels and islands, surrounded by extensive intertidal mudflats and marshes (Pratolongo et al. 2013). The inner zone of the estuary is characterized by a shallow (~7 m depth) and vertically homogeneous water column, due to the strong tidal mixing and wind forcing (Popovich and Marcovecchio 2008). Turbidity and nutrient contents are typically high, with a strong seasonal pattern (Popovich and Marcovecchio 2008). ER, in the adjacent shelf, extends to the 50 m isobath (Acha et al. 2004). Within the ER area, low-salinity waters and sediments from the continent (Río Negro, Río Colorado and BBE), highly saline waters from the south (San Matías Gulf) and shelf waters of typically intermediate salinity combine to create oceanic fronts and circulation cells that favor retention mechanisms, creating an appropriate environment for successful larval fish development (Hoffmeyer et al. 2009; Acha et al. 2012; Delgado et al. 2015). Sandy beaches of MH and Pehuen Có are one of the most visited touristic destinations of Argentina (Vaquero et al. 2007). These beaches are transitional environments between estuarine shorelines and open beaches of Buenos Aires Province (Carcedo et al. 2015; Menéndez et al. 2016), and commonly receive significant amounts of estuarine sediments (Delgado et al. 2016).
Fig. 1

Study area located in the southwestern Atlantic, Argentina. The area comprised the Bahía Blanca Estuary, the adjacent shelf El Rincón and the surf beach of Monte Hermoso to the north. Numbers represent bathymetry expressed in meters. Samplings sites included in the checklist are shown (red circles = own sampling surveys, blue circles = literature sampling points)

Own data collection and literature review

We present own data from 89 plankton samples, collected in 33 sampling campaigns. Plankton sampling within the study area was performed in December 2012, and recurring monthly campaigns were carried out from April 2013 to May 2014, and from December 2014 to February 2015 (Fig. 1). To collect the samples, Hensen-like zooplankton nets were used (mouth diameters 30 and 40 cm, and mesh sizes 67, 200 and 500 μm) and also a modified RMT (Rectangular Midwater Trawl; mouth opening 2.25 m2 and mesh size 1000), designed to capture a wider size range of gelatinous organisms. Hensen nets were used in oblique tows (bottom to surface) from a motorboat or ship moving at ~2 knots, during 7 min. The RMT net was deployed against the ebb tide current, during 20 min. Records of stranded individuals were also considered.

Gelatinous species were fixed using a solution of 4% formaldehyde in seawater and later identified following Mayer (1910), Kramp (1961), Bouillon (1999), Mianzan (1999), Mianzan and Cornelius (1999) and Bouillon et al. (2006). When necessary, the hydrozoan collection stored at the J. J. Nágera Biological Station (Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata, Argentina) was consulted. Species which do not tolerate fixation (as the ctenophore Mnemiopsis leidyi) were immediately identified after capture. Photographic records of the collected species were obtained with a digital camera attached to a stereomicroscope, before their deposit in the Instituto Argentino de Oceanografia (IADO-CONICET). The bibliographical review was based on an exhaustive analysis of the regional literature on zooplankton published since the first scientific contributions in the 1970’s until 2015, including technical reports, PhD and Ms Thesis (Table 1).
Table 1

Review of medusae and ctenophores from the Bahía Blanca region (Argentina) based on own data and literature data. In each case, data related to study area and type of collection from own samples are highlighted in bold while those from literature are not highlighted; when both sources overlap, data are italic

Taxa

Sampling date

Study area

Source

Type of collection

Phylum CNIDARIA

    

Class HYDROZOA

    

Subclass HYDROIDOLINA

    

Order ANTHOATHECATA

    

Suborder FILIFERA

    

Family OCEANIIDAE

Turritopsis nutricula

1979–1981; 1983–2008; 2010; 2013–2014

BBE-ER-MH

Hoffmeyer 1983; Ramírez and Zamponi 1980; Genzano et al. 2008a; Rodriguez 2012; This study

J, A

Family PANDEIDAE

Amphinema dinema a

2013; 2015

ER-MH

This study

A

Family PROBOSCIDACTYLIDAE

Proboscidactyla mutabilis

1970; 1983–2008

ER

Ramírez and Zamponi 1980; Genzano et al. 2008a; Rodriguez 2012

A

Family PROTIARIDAE

Halitiara formosa a

2013–2014

ER-MH

This study

J, A

Suborder APLANULATA

    

Family CORYMORPHIDAE

Corymorpha januarii

1982; 1983–2008; 2010; 2013–2014

BBE-ER

Genzano et al. 2009a; Rodriguez 2012; This study

H c, J, A

Family TUBULARIIDAE

Hybocodon chilensis

1983–2008; 2010

BBE-ER

Genzano et al. 2008a; Rodriguez 2012; Rodriguez et al. 2012

J, A

Order LEPTOTHECATA

    

Family AEQUOREIDAE

Aequorea forskalea a

2014

MH

This study

J, A

Family CAMPANULARIIDAE

Clytia gracilis

1971–1972; 1997; 1998; 2003; 2013–2014

BBE-ER-MH

Bastida and Torti 1971; Bastida et al. 1977; Genzano et al. 2009b; Rodriguez 2012; This study

H, A

Clytia hemisphaerica

1983–2008; 2010; 2014

ER-MH

Genzano et al. 2009b; Rodriguez 2012; This study

H, A

Clytia lomae a

2014

MH

This study

A

Clytia simplex

1970

ER

Ramírez and Zamponi 1980

A

Obelia spp.

1979–1981; 1993–2006; 2013–2014

BBE-ER-MH

Hoffmeyer 1983; Blanco 1994; Hoffmeyer and Barría de Cao 2007; Genzano et al. 2008b; Genzano et al. 2009b; Rodriguez 2012; This study

H, J, A

Family EIRENIDAE

Eutonina scintillans

2006

ER

Rodriguez et al. 2007

A

Family LOVENELLIDAE

Eucheilota ventricularis

1983–2008;2010; 2013–2014

BBE-ER-MH

Rodriguez 2006; Rodriguez 2012; This study

J, A

Family MITROCOMIDAE

Cosmetirella davisi

1983–2008; 2010

ER

Ramírez and Zamponi 1980; Rodriguez 2012

A

Mitrocomella frigida

1970; 1983–2002

ER

Ramírez and Zamponi 1980; Rodriguez 2006

A

Mitrocomella brownei

1983–2008; 2010

ER

Genzano et al. 2008a; Rodriguez 2012

J, A

Halopsis ocellata a

2015

MH

This study

A

Subclass TRACHYLINAE

    

Order LIMNOMEDUSAE

    

Family OLINDIIDAE

Aglauropsis kawari

1983–2008; 2015

ER-MH

Genzano et al. 2008a; This study

A, J

Gossea brachymera

1982–1984; 2013–2014

BBE-ER-MH

Mianzan 1986a; This study

na; J, A

Olindias sambaquiensis

1981–1984; 2013–2014

BBE-ER-MH

Mianzan 1986a; Zamponi and Mianzan 1985; Mianzan 1989c; Macchi et al. 1995; Chiaverano et al. 2004; Chiaverano & Mianzan 2001; Rodriguez 2012; This study

J, A

Order TRACHYMEDUSAE

    

Family GERYONIIDAE

Liriope tetraphylla

1983; 1987–1988; 1992–2002; 2013–2014

BBE-ER-MH

Gaitán 2004; Rodriguez 2012; This study

J, A

Family HALICREATIDAE

Halitrephes maasi

1970

ER

Ramírez and Zamponi 1980

A

Class SCYPHOZOA

    

Subclass DISCOMEDUSAE

    

Order SEMAEOSTOMEAE

    

Family CYANEIDAE

Drymonema gorgo

1982–1984; 2008; 2012

BBE-MH

Mianzan 1986a; Mianzan 1989a, b; This study

J b

Family PELAGIIDAE

Chrysaora lactea

1982–1984; 2013–2014

BBE-ER-MH

Mianzan 1986a; Mianzan 1989a, b; This study

E, J, A

Family ULMARIDAE

Aurelia aurita

1982–1984; 2008; 2013

BBE-MH

Mianzan 1986a; Mianzan 1989a, b; This study

E, J, A

Phylum CTENOPHORA

    

Class TENTACULATA

    

Subclass CYCLOCOELA

    

Order LOBATA

    

Family BOLINOPSIDAE

Mnemiopsis leidyi

1982–1984; 1990; 2013–2014

BBE-ER-MH

Mianzan and Sabatini 1985; Mianzan 1986a; Hoffmeyer 1990 (as Mnemiopsis mccrady); This study

J, A

Subclass TYPHLOCOELA

    

Order CYDIPPIDA

    

Family PLEUROBRACHIIDAE

Pleurobrachia pileus

1979–1981; 2013–2014

BBE-ER-MH

Hoffmeyer 1983; This study

na; J, A

Class NUDA

    

Order BEROIDA

    

Family BEROIDAE

Beroe ovata

1982–1984; 2013–2014

BBE-ER-MH

Mianzan 1986a, b; This study

J, A

Abbreviations: BBE Bahía Blanca Estuary, MH Monte Hermoso, ER El Rincón

E ephyrae, H hydroids, J juveniles, A adults, Ac actinula larvae

na not available

a first record for the region

b material provided by Prof. Verónica Arias and storaged at Cátedra de Zoología de Invertebrados I, Universidad Nacional del Sur, Bahía Blanca, Argentina

c material provided by Alberto Conte and storaged at the Instituto Argentino de Oceanografía, Bahía Blanca, Argentina

Results

Species composition, richness and current observations

In all, 29 species were either found in our samples or reported by others in the study area (26 of Medusozoa and 3 of Ctenophora; Table 1). Among these, 16 species (55.2% of all gelatinous species) were recorded in our samples and also in the literature, eight species (27.6%) were only found cited in the literature, but they did not appear in our samples, and the remaining five species (17.2%) were found exclusively in our samples (Table 1).

Within Medusozoa, 23 species belong to the class Hydrozoa (88.5% of Medusozoa), distributed among the orders Anthomedusae (26%), with six families and six genera, Leptomedusae (52.2%), with five families and 12 genera, Limnomedusae (13%), with one family and three genera, and Trachymedusae (8.7%), with two families and two genera. Three of the species reported in Table 1, Proboscidactyla mutabilis, Mitrocomella frigida and Olindias sambaquiensis are considered endemic to the southwestern Atlantic. Species identified to genus level only included Obelia spp. (Hydrozoa, Leptothecata), for which medusa specimens cannot be reliably determined down to species level (Bouillon et al. 2006). However, when hydroids were found at the time of medusae, the nominal species O. longissima, O. dichotoma and O. bidentata were cited for the study area. Five hydrozoan species (2 Anthomedusae and 3 Leptomedusae), collected in our samples, were reported for the first time in the study area: Halitiara formosa (Fewkes 1882), Amphinema dinema (Péron and Lesueur, 1810), Aequorea forskalea (Péron and Lesueur 1810), Clytia lomae (Torrey 1909) and Halopsis ocellata (Agassiz, 1865) (Fig. 2). Their taxonomic descriptions are provided below. The record of H. ocellata in MH is, as far as we know, the northern record for the Southwestern Atlantic. With respect to A. forskalea, large numbers of adult and juvenile specimens were commonly observed in MH, either stranded on the beach or in coastal waters, during January 2014, and the massive occurrence repeated in February 2016.
Fig. 2

Photographs of the five hydromedusae species firstly observed in the study area. A) Adults of H. formosa, B1-2) Adults of A. dinema, C1) juvenile and C2-3) adults of A. forskalea, D1-2) adults of C. lomae, E1-2) adults of H. ocellata. C3 and E1-2 reproduced with the permission of Kåre Telnes (www.seawater.no)

Scyphozoa was represented by three species of the order Semaeostomeae, families Pelagiidae, Ulmaridae and Cyaneidae. Chrysaora lactea, Aurelia aurita and Drymonema gorgo were the only scyphozoans recorded in the area (Table 1). We did not find A. aurita ephyrae in our samples, although the use of this coastal area as a reproduction site had been suggested (Mianzan 1986a). Regarding C. lactea, ephyrae of this species were frequently found in our samples, mainly in BBE and ER.

The Phylum Ctenophora was represented by three species of the orders Lobata, Cydippida and Beroida (cf. Table 1). Mnemiopsis leidyi was found throughout the year, with higher concentrations during autumn and spring, mainly in channels within the BBE connected with island zones. Beroe ovata was also found in the estuary almost all year round, and aggregations of Pleurobrachia pileus were observed in the inner estuary during early spring.

Finally, three stinging species of public health concern were found in the area: the hydromedusae Olindias sambaquiensis and Liriope tetraphylla, and the scyphomedusa Chrysaora lactea. Regarding stinging species, a consistent summer trend was observed since 2013, characterized by decreasing numbers of O. sambaquiensis, and large amounts of L. tetraphylla (from 600 to more than 1000 ind.m−3).

Taxonomic descriptions of the species observed for the first time in the study area

Halitiara formosa Fewkes 1882

Umbrella about 3 mm high, pear-shaped, with solid apical projection about half as long as bell cavity, 4 straight radial canals; 4 long, hollow perradial marginal tentacles and 24–35 short, solid cirrus-like tentacles; mouth simple, cruciform; with or without mesenteries; “gonads” interradial, smooth, sometimes extending over mesenteries; without ocelli; cnidome, when known, with merotrichous isorhizae (Bouillon 1999; Bouillon et al. 2006) (Fig. 2 A).

Amphinema dinema Péron and Lesueur 1810

Umbrella up to 4 mm wide and 6 mm high with considerable conical, solid, apical projection, jelly of uniform thickness around top. Four undivided radial canals. Manubrium with broad base, cross-like in section, flask-shaped, almost as long as bell cavity. Mouth with four prominent, recurved lips. With eight simple adradial gonads, smooth, on manubrium wall only. Two perradial, hollow, marginal tentacles with large elongated conical basal bulbs; bulbs without ocelli. With 14–24 small marginal warts (Bouillon 1999) (Fig. 2 B1-2).

Aequorea forskalea Péron and Lesueur 1810

Flat umbrella, 14–32 mm in diameter. Short manubrium, mouth large, about half the diameter of umbrella. Numerous radial canals (usually 60–80, sometimes fewer, and up to 160). Tentacles with elongate conical bulbs, generally less numerous than radial canals but varying from half to the same number of them; 5–10 statocysts between successive radial canals. Gonads along almost the entire length of the radial canals (Nagata et al. 2014) (Fig. 2 C1-3).

Clytia lomae Torrey 1909

Umbrella 9–12 mm in diameter, about 4 times broader than high, thin. Gonads narrow, elongated along less than 1/2 of the distal part of radial canals; about 32 tentacles and some young bulbs. Manubrium short, cruciform; mouth with 4 slightly frilled lips; bulbs elongated; 1 (rarely 2) statocysts between successive tentacles (Bouillon 1999). Smaller medusae (umbrella 3–5 mm wide) have been observed in Argentine waters (Rodriguez 2012; this study) (Fig. 2 D1-2).

Halopsis ocellata Agassiz 1865

Umbrella 50–65 mm in diameter, about 4 times as wide as high, watch-glass-shaped; mesoglea thick toward centre; manubrium broad, flat, 1/5 of bell diameter, circular to star-shaped in outline; mouth with 4 fairly short lips; 12–16 radial canals in 4 groups branching usually within outline of manubrium; gonads linear, about 2/3 of radial canals; up to 450 marginal tentacles; 1 marginal cirrus between successive tentacles; about 80 statocysts (Bouillon 1999). Smaller medusae (umbrella up to 28 mm in diameter) have been observed in Argentine waters (Rodriguez 2012; this study) (Fig. 2 E1-2).

Discussion

Our study provides the first compiled list of medusae and ctenophores species of the Bahía Blanca region, adding five hydromedusae species that had not been previously reported for the area. We found a high richness of hydromedusae species compared to values reported along the temperate Southwestern Atlantic platform (Genzano et al. 2008a; Rodriguez 2012). Based on an exhaustive sampling carried out across the neritic region from 33° to 55°S, over 20 years, Genzano et al. (2008a) recognized 71 hydromedusae species. Our study area covers less than 3% of the area covered by Genzano et al. (2008a), but we found 32.4% of the total number of hydromedusae species detected by these authors, a disproportionally large richness for the small area considered.

Taking into account the transitional location of our study area and the hydromedusae faunal list by Rodriguez (2012), we found species that equally represent both the Rionegrin and Uruguayan biogeographic districts. According to Balech and Ehrlich (2008), the Argentine Province is essentially neritic, characterized by a marked biological heterogeneity due to the mix of subtropical and subantarctic waters. This combination of subtropical and subantartic elements also determines a low level of endemism for organisms in this region. The fundamentally neritic character of the Argentine Province is further reflected in the dominance of meroplanktonic species in the Bahía Blanca region (see Bouillon et al. 2006). Among hydromedusae, the meroplanktonic Leptomedusae showed the highest genus diversity followed by Anthomedusae, and only three species of hydromedusae considered endemic to the southwestern Atlantic were observed (Mianzan 1989c; Genzano et al. 2008a).

The species observed for the first time in the study area also belong to the orders Leptomedusae and Anthomedusae. Halitiara formosa, A. dinema and C. lomae were previously reported in the Argentine Sea south and north of our study area, while H. ocellata and A. forskalea were reported in austral waters (from 51° to 54°50′S and from 43° to 53°S, respectively). This later species was reported in Patagonian waters and there is only one record northward from our study area within the Argentine Sea (37°40′S-56°02′W) (Genzano et al. 2008a). The underlying causes of the massive occurrences of A. forskalea observed in MH during January 2014 and February 2016 are still unresolved. We hypothesize that changes in currents and wind patterns might have produced a recurrent advection of large numbers of individuals, but further studies are required to understand the origin of these mass occurrences. However it has to be also considered that jellyfish research in the study area has been neglected over the past 20 years, and the increasing sampling effort on gelatinous zooplankton throughout the last 5 years increased the proportion of findings related to gelatinous species.

Chrysaora lactea, A. aurita and D. gorgo were the only scyphozoans found in the study area (Mianzan 1989a, b; Schiariti et al. 2016; this study). Although we did not find A. aurita ephyrae in our samples, recently released ephyrae of this species were reported by Mianzan (1989a) who suggested the use of this coastal area as a reproduction site. Regarding C. lactea even though medusae are rather common and widespread, ephyrae have been rarely observed in plankton samples elsewhere (Mianzan 1989a, 1989b; Tronolone et al. 2002). In our samples, however, ephyrae of C. lactea were frequently found, which supports the suggestion by Mianzan (1989a) about the reproduction area for these scyphozoans. Polyps of C. lactea have never been found in nature (Morandini et al. 2004). Potential substrata for polyp settlement include docks, harbors, support structures of industries, dredged material storage piles, buoys, fouling fauna, native vegetation, rocky, muddy and sandy bottoms (Miyake et al. 2002; Morandini et al. 2004; Lucas et al. 2012), all of them available in the study area. Future research should include benthic surveys to explore the presence of benthic stages, and their association with natural and human-made substrates. Finally, the occurrence of D. gorgo is a rare event that reconfirms its geographical distributional range for these latitudes (Mianzan 1989a, 1989b). Information on its ecology and distribution is very scarce due to its sporadic occurrence and the few specimens available for study (Williams et al. 2001; Bayha and Dawson 2010).

Coastal ctenophores are a major macroplanktonic group in the Southwestern Atlantic (Mianzan 1999), that may dominate zooplankton abundance and biomass (Mianzan et al. 1996; Mianzan and Guerrero 2000). In our study area, aggregations of ctenophores were observed at different times and sites (Hoffmeyer 1983; Mianzan and Sabatini 1985; Mianzan 1986a; Hoffmeyer 1990, this study). The occurrences of M. leidyi, B. ovata, and P. pileus in our samples are in agreement with findings by Mianzan and Sabatini (1985) and Mianzan (1986a).

Regarding the three species of public health concern, O. sambaquiensis has been long considered the most problematic species in terms of its health consequences, as well as its detrimental effects on touristic development (Mianzan et al. 2001). It causes severe skin damage and pain (Kokelj et al. 1993). Adults range in size from 6 to 10 cm (Nagata et al. 2014) although specimens up to 21 cm were observed in our study area (Mianzan 1986a). This species has a clear seasonal pattern of high-density aggregations during the warmest months (Macchi et al. 1995; Mianzan and Ramírez 1996), and were reported in the area from October to April (Mianzan 1986a). In spite of its presence year after year, the asexual polyp phase of O. sambaquinsis remains unidentified, and little is known about its population dynamic and reproduction (Macchi et al. 1995; Chiaverano et al. 2004). Regarding our samples, immature stages were expected to be found in late spring, as well as adults in summer. Nevertheless, juveniles did not appear and observations of adults reduced to sporadic occurrence in the area. This is in accordance with the unusual trend observed since 2013, characterized by a disappearance of the high-density aggregations usually observed (Brendel AS, Dutto MS, Menéndez MC, Huamantinco Cisneros MA, Piccolo MC: Wind pattern variation in a SW Atlantic beach: An explanation for changes in the coastal occurrence of the medusa Olindias sambaquiensis, submitted). The large amounts of L. tetraphylla observed in summer, since 2014, have also raised concern. These aggregations which can cause severe pruritus and strong itching sensation in sensitive areas of human skin conform a locally-known phenomenon called “tapioca”, which was well documented on northern beaches in Argentina and Uruguay (Mianzan et al. 2000), but never reported in this geographic area or further south. Finally, Chrysaora lactea was the last stinging species found in the study area. It is one of the most common blooming scyphozoan along the entire South Western Atlantic coast (Mianzan and Cornelius 1999; Migotto et al. 2002; Schiariti et al. 2016). This species can cause mild to moderate local pain and burning sensation. Although less common, erythema and edema forming lesions were also reported (Marques et al. 2014).

The background list provided lays the foundation for the development of further investigations on gelatinous zooplankton in this highly relevant economic and biological coastal area. Benthic surveys are required to confirm the occurrence of polyps and to provide potential valuable information on the biology of the gelatinous species (e.g. life cycle) inhabiting this geographic region.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by Agencia Nacional de Promoción Científica y Tecnológica (PICT 2011-2096 to M.S. Hoffmeyer, PICT 2013-1773 to A. Schiariti, and PICT 2012-2071 to P.D. Pratolongo), Secretaría General de Ciencia y Tecnología, Universidad Nacional del Sur (PGI 24 B/236), Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata (EXA 734/15 to G.N. Genzano), and Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología of Argentina (PIP 0152 to G.N. Genzano and PIP 2013-00615 to A. Schiariti). We thank greatly to A. Conte, E. Redondo, E. Contardi, C. Bernárdez, and J. Albrizio, to Cámara de Pescadores de Monte Hermoso and Pehuen Có, especially to E. Flores, and to all the colleagues which help and assist during samplings and laboratory activities: A. Berasategui, E. Nahuelhual, R. Uibrig, D. Muro Schenfelt, M. Garcia, J. Chazarreta, C. López Abbate, C. Menéndez, A. Delgado, V. Guinder, F. Thomsen, R. Elicer, M. Tártara, E. Dos Santos, L. Diaz Briz, C. Rodriguez, and A. Puente Tapia. The collaboration with material of A. Conte, V. Arias and D. Tanzola is also much appreciated. Thanks are also due to A. Migotto for providing photographs and W. Melo for drawing the map. We appreciate the thorough review of the manuscript by Dr. M. Thiel and two anonymous referees.

Authors’ contributions

GNG, AS, MSH and PDP contributed to draft the manuscript. MSD wrote the manuscript. GNG and AS participated in the identification of the species. JL contributed with biological material. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET)
(2)
Instituto Argentino de Oceanografía (IADO-CONICET/UNS), Área Oceanografía Biológica
(3)
Instituto de Investigaciones Marinas y Costeras (IIMyC)
(4)
Departamento de Ciencias Marinas, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata (UNMdP)
(5)
Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo Pesquero (INIDEP)
(6)
Museo Municipal de Ciencias Naturales de Monte Hermoso
(7)
Universidad Nacional del Sur (UNS)
(8)
Facultad Regional Bahía Blanca, Universidad Tecnológica Nacional (UTN)
(9)
Departamento de Biología, Bioquímica y Farmacia, UNS

References

  1. Acha EM, Mianzan HW, Guerrero RA, Favero M, Bava J. Marine fronts at the continental shelves of austral South America: Physical and ecological processes. J Mar Syst. 2004;44:83–105.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Acha EM, Orduna M, Rodrigues K, Militelli MI, Braverman M. Caracterización de la zona de “El Rincón” (provincia de Buenos Aires) como área de reproducción de peces costeros. Revista de Investigación y Desarrollo Pesquero. 2012;21:31–43.Google Scholar
  3. Agassiz A. Halopsis ocellata. Proc Boston Soc Nat Hist. 1865;9:219–20.Google Scholar
  4. Balech E, Ehrlich MD. Esquema Biogeográfico del Mar Argentino. Revista de Investigación y Desarrollo Pesquero. 2008;19:45–75.Google Scholar
  5. Bastida RO, Torti MR. Estudio preliminar sobre las incrustaciones biológicas de Puerto Belgrano. LEMIT-Anales. 1971;3:47–75.Google Scholar
  6. Bastida RO, L’Hoste S, Spivak E, Adabbo H. Las incrustaciones biológicas de Puerto Belgrano. I. Estudio de la fijación sobre paneles mensuales, período 1971/72. Corrosión y Protección. 1977;8:1–23.Google Scholar
  7. Bayha KM, Dawson MN. New Family of Allomorphic Jellyfishes, Drymonematidae (Scyphozoa, Discomedusae), Emphasizes Evolution in the Functional Morphology and Trophic Ecology of Gelatinous Zooplankton. Biol Bull. 2010;219:249–67.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Blanco O. Enumeración sistemática y distribución geográfica preliminar de los Hidroides de la República Argentina. Suborden Athecata (Gymnoblastea, Anthomedusae), Thecata (Calyptoblastea, Leptomedusae) y Limnomedusae. Revista del Museo de La Plata. 1994;14:181–216.Google Scholar
  9. Bouillon J. Hydromedusae. In: Boltovskoy D, editor. South Atlantic Zooplankton. Leiden: Backhuys Publishers; 1999. p. 385–465.Google Scholar
  10. Bouillon J, Gravili C, Pagès F, Gili JM, Boero F. An introduction to Hydrozoa. Memoires du Museum National d’Histoire Naturelle. Publications Scientifiques, vol. 194. 2006. p. 591.Google Scholar
  11. Carcedo MC, Fiori SM, Piccolo MC, López Abbate MC, Bremec CS. Variations in macrobenthic community structure in relation to changing environmental conditions in sandy beaches of Argentina. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci. 2015;166:56–64.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Carozza C, Fernández Aráoz NC. Análisis de la actividad de la flota en el área de “El Rincón” dirigida al variado costero durante el período 2000-2008 y situación de los principales recursos pesqueros. INIDEP Informe técnico oficial N° 23/09. 2009.Google Scholar
  13. Chiaverano L, Mianzan H. Dinámica y estructura poblacional de Olindias sambaquiensis, Muller, 1861 (Limnomedusae, Olindiidae) durante su fase sexual en la zona de Bahía Blanca (Buenos Aires, Argentina). San Andrés Isla: IX Congreso Latinoamericano sobre Ciencias del Mar; 2001.
  14. Chiaverano L, Mianzan H, Ramírez F. Gonad development and somatic growth patterns of Olindias sambaquiensis (Limnomedusae, Olindiidae). Hydrobiologia. 2004;530–531:373–81.Google Scholar
  15. Delgado AL, Loisel H, Jamet C, Vantrepotte V, Perillo GME, Piccolo MC. Seasonal and inter-annual analysis of chlorophyll-a and inherent optical properties from satellite observations in the inner and mid-shelves of the south of Buenos Aires Province (Argentina). Remote Sens. 2015;7:11821–47.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Delgado AL, Menéndez MC, Piccolo MC, and Perillo GME. Hydrography of the inner continental shelf ’along the southwest Buenos Aires Province, Argentina: Influence of an estuarine plume on coastal waters. J Coastal Res. 2016. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.2112/JCOASTRES-D-16-00064.1.
  17. Delhey K, Petracci PF. Aves marinas y costeras. In: Piccolo MC, Hoffmeyer MS, editors. Ecosistema del Estuario de Bahía Blanca. Bahía Blanca: EdiUNS; 2004. p. 203–20.Google Scholar
  18. Fewkes JW. Notes on acalephs from the Tortugas, with a description of new genera and species. In: Agassiz A, editor. Explorations of the surface fauna of the Gulf Stream, under the auspices of the U.S. Coast Survey. Bulletin of the Museum of comparative Zoölogy of Harvard College, vol. 9. 1882. p. 251–89.Google Scholar
  19. Gaitán EN. Distribución, abundancia y estacionalidad de Liriope tetraphylla (Hidromedusa, Trachymedusae) en el Océano Atlántico Sudoccidental y su rol ecológico en el estuario del Río de la Plata. MSc thesis. Mar del Plata: Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata; 2004.Google Scholar
  20. Genzano G, Mianzan H, Bouillon J. Hydromedusae (Cnidaria: Hydrozoa) from the temperate southwestern Atlantic Ocean: a review. Zootaxa. 2008a;1750:1–18.Google Scholar
  21. Genzano GN, Mianzan HW, Diaz BL, Rodriguez CS. On the occurrence of Obelia medusa bloom and empirical evidence of an unusual Obelia and Amphisbetia hydroids shoreline massive accumulations. Lat Am J Aquat Res. 2008b;36:301–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Genzano GN, Giberto D, Schejter L, Bremec C, Meretta P. Hydroid assemblages from the Southwestern Atlantic Ocean (34–42° S). Mar Ecol. 2009a;30:33–46.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Genzano GN, Rodriguez C, Pastorino G, Mianzan HW. The hydroid and medusa of Corymorpha januarii in temperate waters of the Southwestern Atlantic Ocean. Bull Mar Sci. 2009b;84:229–35.Google Scholar
  24. Guinder VA, Popovich CA, Molinero JC, Marcovecchio J. Phytoplankton summer bloom dynamics in the Bahía Blanca Estuary in relation to changing environmental conditions. Cont Shelf Res. 2013;52:150–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Hoffmeyer MS. Zooplancton del área interna de Bahía Blanca (Buenos Aires - Argentina). I- Composición faunística. Hist Nat. 1983;3:73–94.Google Scholar
  26. Hoffmeyer MS. Algunas observaciones sobre la alimentación de Mnemiopsis mccradyi Mayer (Ctenophora-Lobata). Iheringia Serie Zoologia. 1990;70:55–65.Google Scholar
  27. Hoffmeyer MS, Barría de Cao MS. Zooplankton assemblage from a tidal channel in the Bahía Blanca Estuary. Braz J Oceanogr. 2007;55:97–107.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Hoffmeyer MS, Mianzan HW. Macrozooplancton del estuario de Bahía Blanca y aguas adyacentes. In: Piccolo MC, Hoffmeyer MS, editors. Ecosistema del Estuario de Bahía Blanca. Bahía Blanca: EdiUNS; 2004. p. 143–51.Google Scholar
  29. Hoffmeyer MS, Menéndez MC, Biancalana F, Nizovoy AM, Torres ER. Ichthyoplankton spatial pattern in the inner shelf off Bahía Blanca Estuary, SW Atlantic Ocean. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci. 2009;84:383–92.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Kokelj F, Mianzan H, Avian M, Burnett JW. Dermatitits due to Olindias sambaquiensis: a case report. Cutis. 1993;51:339–42.Google Scholar
  31. Kramp PL. Synopsis of the medusa of the world. J Mar Biol Assoc U K. 1961;40:1–469.Google Scholar
  32. Lucas CH, Graham WM, Widmer C. Jellyfish life histories: role of polyps in forming and maintaining scyphomedusa populations. Adv Mar Biol. 2012;63:133–96.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Macchi G, Mianzan H, Cristiansen H, Ramírez F. Histology of the gonadal cycle of the stinging hydromedusa Olindias sambaquiensis, Muller, 1861 at Blanca Bay, Argentina. Bolletino della Societa Adriatica di Scienze. 1995;76:59–68.Google Scholar
  34. Marques AC, Haddad Jr V, Rodrigo L, Marques-da-Silva E, Morandini AC. Jellyfish (Chrysaora lactea, Cnidaria, Semaeostomeae) aggregations in southern Brazil and consequences of stings in humans. Lat Am J Aquat Res. 2014;42:1192–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Mayer A. Medusae of the world. Hydromedusae. 1910;1:1–230.Google Scholar
  36. Menéndez MC, Fernández Severini MD, Buzzi NS, Piccolo MC, Perillo GME. Assessment of surf zone environmental variables in a southwestern Atlantic sandy beach (Monte Hermoso, Argentina). Environ Monit Assess. 2016;188:495–507. doi:10.1007/s10661-016-5495-9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Mianzan HW. Estudio sistemático y bioecológico de algunas medusas Scyphozoa de la región subantártica. Phd thesis. La Plata: Universidad Nacional de La Plata; 1986a.Google Scholar
  38. Mianzan HW. Beroe ovata en aguas de la Bahía Blanca, Argentina (Ctenophora). Spheniscus. 1986b;2:29–32.Google Scholar
  39. Mianzan HW. Las medusas Scyphozoa de la Bahía Blanca. Boletim do Instituto Oceanografico São Paulo. 1989a;37:29–32.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Mianzan HW. Sistemática y zoogregrafía de Scyphomedusae en aguas neríticas argentinas. Investigaciones Marinas CICIMAR. 1989b;4:15–34.Google Scholar
  41. Mianzan HW. Distribución de Olindias sambaquiesis Müller, 1861 (Hydrozoa, Limnomedusae) en el Atlántico Sudoccidental. Iheringia Série Zoologia. 1989c;69:155–7.Google Scholar
  42. Mianzan HW. Ctenophora. In: Boltovskoy D, editor. South Atlantic Zooplankton. Leiden: Blackhuys Publishers; 1999. p. 561–73.Google Scholar
  43. Mianzan HW, Cornelius PFS. Cubomedusae and Scyphomedusae. In: Boltovskoy D, editor. South Atlantic Zooplankton. Leiden: Backhuys Publishers; 1999. p. 513–59.Google Scholar
  44. Mianzan HW, Guerrero RA. Environmental patterns and biomass distribution of gelatinous macrozooplankton. Three study cases in the South-Western Atlantic Ocean. Sci Mar. 2000;64:215–24.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  45. Mianzan HW, Ramírez FC. Olindias sambaquiensis stings in the South West Atlantic. In: Williamson JAH, Fenner PJ, Burnett JW, Rifkin JF, editors. Venomous and poisonous marine animals: a medical and biological handbook. Brisbane: University of New South Wales Press; 1996. p. 206–8.Google Scholar
  46. Mianzan HW, Sabatini M. Estudio preliminar sobre distribución y abundancia de Mnemiopsis maccradyi en el estuario de Bahía Blanca (Ctenophora). Spheniscus. 1985;1:53–68.Google Scholar
  47. Mianzan HW, Zamponi MO. Estudio bioecológico de Olindias sambaquiensis Müller, 1861 (Limnomedusae, Olindiidae) en el área de Monte Hermoso. II. Factores meteorológicos que influyen en su aparición. Iheringia Série Miscelanea. 1988;2:63–8.Google Scholar
  48. Mianzan HW, Mari N, Prenski B, Sanchez F. Fish predation on neritic ctenophores from the Argentine continental shelf: A neglected food resource? Fish Res. 1996;27:69–79.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  49. Mianzan HW, Sorarrain D, Burnett JW, Lutz LL. Mucocutaneous junctional and flexural paresthesias caused by the holoplanktonic trachymedusae Liriope tetraphylla. Dermatology. 2000;201:46–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  50. Mianzan HW, Fenner PJ, Cornelius PFS, Ramírez C. Vinegar as disarming agent to prevent further discharge of the nematocysts of the stinging hydromedusa Olindias sambaquiensis. Cutis. 2001;6:45–8.Google Scholar
  51. Migotto AE, Marques AC, Morandini AC, da Silveira FL. Checklist of the Cnidaria Medusozoa of Brazil. Biota Neotropica. 2002;2:1–31.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  52. Miyake H, Terazaki M, Kakinuma Y. On the polyps of the common jellyfish Aurelia aurita in Kagoshima Bay. J Oceanogr. 2002;58:451–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  53. Morandini AC, da Silveira FL, Jarms G. The life cycle of Chrysaora lactea Eschscholtz, 1829 (Cnidaria, Scyphozoa) with notes on the scyphistoma stage of three other species. Hydrobiologia. 2004;530:347–54.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  54. Nagata RM, Nogueira M, Haddad MA. Faunistic survey of Hydromedusae (Cnidaria, Medusozoa) from the coast of Paraná State, Southern Brazil. Zootaxa. 2014;3768:291–326.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  55. Negrin VL, Botté SE, Pratolongo PD, González TG, Marcovecchio JE. Ecological processes and biogeochemical cycling in salt marshes: synthesis of studies in the Bahía Blanca estuary (Argentina). Hydrobiologia. 2016;774:217–35.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  56. Péron F, Lesueur CA. Tableau des caractères génériques et spécifiques de toutes les espèces de méduses connues jusqu’à ce jour. Annales du Muséum National d’histoire Naturelle de Paris. 1810;14:325–66.Google Scholar
  57. Pizarro N, Piccolo MC. Socio-economic issues in the Bahía Blanca Estuary. In: Neves R, Baretta J, Mateus M, editors. Perspectives on integrated coastal zone management in South America. Lisbon: IST Press; 2008. p. 287–300.Google Scholar
  58. Popovich CE, Marcovecchio JE. Spatial and temporal variability of phytoplankton and environmental factors in a temperate estuary of South America (Atlantic coast, Argentina). Cont Shelf Res. 2008;28:236–44.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  59. Pratolongo P, Mazzon C, Zapperi G, Piovan MJ, Brinson MM. Land cover changes in tidal salt marshes of the Bahía Blanca estuary (Argentina) during the past 40 years. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci. 2013;133:23–31.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  60. Ramírez FC, Zamponi MO. Medusas de la plataforma bonaerense y sectores adyacentes. Physis. 1980;39:33–48.Google Scholar
  61. Ramírez FC, Zamponi MO. Hydromedusae. In: Boltovskoy D, editor. Atlas del Zooplancton del Atlántico Sudoccidental y Métodos de Trabajo con el Zooplancton Marino. Mar del Plata: Publicaciones Especiales de INIDEP; 1981. p. 443–69.Google Scholar
  62. Rodriguez CS. Distribución, abundancia y estacionalidad de Mitrocomella frigida y Eucheilota ventricularis (Hydrozoa, Leptomedusae) en el Atlántico Sudoccidental (33-55° S). MSc thesis. Mar del Plata: Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata; 2006.Google Scholar
  63. Rodriguez C. Hidromedusas del Atlántico Sudoccidental: biodiversidad y patrones de distribución. PhD thesis. Mar del Plata: Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata; 2012.Google Scholar
  64. Rodriguez C, Genzano G, Mianzan H. First record of Eutonina scintillans Bigelow, 1909 (Hydrozoa: Leptomedusae: Eirenidae) in temperate waters of the southwestern Atlantic Ocean. Investig Mar. 2007;35:135–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  65. Rodriguez C, Miranda TP, Marques AC, Mianzan H, Genzano G. The genus Hybocodon (Cnidaria, Hydrozoa) in the southwestern Atlantic Ocean, with a revision of Hybocodon species recorded in the area. Zootaxa. 2012;3523:39–48.Google Scholar
  66. Schiariti A, Dutto MS, Morandini AC. Diversity and spatial distribution of Scyphomedusae and Cubomedusae from Argentina and Uruguay. Barcelona: 5th International Jellyfish Bloom Symposium, May 30-June 3 2016; 2016. p. 152.Google Scholar
  67. Torrey HB. The Leptomedusae of the San Diego region. Univ Calif Publ Zool. 1909;6:11–31.Google Scholar
  68. Tronolone VB, Morandini AC, Migotto AE. On the occurrence of scyphozoan ephyrae (Cnidaria, Scyphozoa, Semaeostomeae and Rhizostomeae) in the southeastern brazilian coast. Biota Neotropica. 2002;2:1–18.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  69. Vaquero M del C, Rodríguez C, Trellini M, de Bulnes Cernadas M, Marcilese J. El turismo residenciado en Monte Hermoso. In: Proceedings of IV Jornadas interdisciplinarias del sudoeste bonaerense, Universidad Nacional del Sur, 7-9 September 2006. Bahía Blanca: Cuestiones políticas, socioculturales y económicas en el sudoeste bonaerense; 2007. p. 201–6.
  70. Williams Jr EH, Bunkley-Williams L, Lilyestrom CG, Larson RJ, Engstrom NA, Ortiz-Corps EAR, Timber JH. A population explosion of the rare tropical/subtropical purple sea mane, Drymonema dalmatinum, around Puerto Rico in the summer and fall of 1999. Caribb J Sci. 2001;37:127–30.Google Scholar
  71. Zamponi MO, Mianzan HW. La mecánica de captura y alimentación de Olindias sambaquiensis Müller, 1861 (Limnomedusae) en el medio natural y en condiciones experimentales. Hist Nat. 1985;5:269–78.Google Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s) 2017

Advertisement