Open Access

First record of seagrass in Cape Verde, eastern Atlantic

  • Joel C. Creed1Email author,
  • Aschwin H. Engelen2,
  • Emanuel C. D´Oliveira3,
  • Salomão Bandeira4 and
  • Ester A. Serrão2
Marine Biodiversity Records20169:57

DOI: 10.1186/s41200-016-0067-9

Received: 9 June 2016

Accepted: 10 June 2016

Published: 1 August 2016

Abstract

Background

The Cape Verde archipelago consists of 10 volcanic islands in the eastern Atlantic Ocean located 570 km off the coast of Western Africa. While the shallow benthic communities have been studied in some detail no seagrasses have been previously reported for the Republic of Cape Verde.

Results

The seagrass Halodule wrightii Ascherson was found and described at one location at Praia, Santiago Island. There it formed a number of patches (≈10) covering a total of ≈ 20 m2 at 1.4–1.6 m depth on fine sand soft bottoms. Some population characteristics are also reported. Two other sites with seagrass are also reported for the first time.

Conclusion

The current record fills a knowledge gap regarding the distribution of seagrasses in the Tropical North Atlantic and it is expected that seagrasses will be found at other suitable sites within the archipelago.

Keywords

Cape Verde Distribution Halodule wrightii Morphology Population Seagrass

Background

The Cape Verde archipelago consists of 10 volcanic islands in the eastern Atlantic Ocean located 570 km off the coast of Senegal, Western Africa (Fig. 1). Cape Verde lies within the Western African Marine Ecoregion (WAMER) and is particularly significant for marine turtle conservation as five species inhabit and feed in local waters and it hosts one of the most important nesting populations of the loggerhead turtle Caretta caretta in the world (Marco et al. 2011). While the shallow benthic communities have been catalogued and studied in some detail (Boekschoten and Best 1988; Morri and Bianchi 1995; Morri et al. 2000; Otero-Schmitt 1995a, b, c; Entrambasaguas et al. 2008; Monteiro et al. 2008; D’Oliveira 2010) no seagrasses have been previously reported in the literature for the Republic of Cape Verde.
Fig. 1

Map of the Cape Verde archipelago and detail of Santiago Island and sites (circles) of occurrence of the seagrass Halodule wrightii. Arrow = North

According to Short et al. (2007) Cape Verde falls within the Tropical Atlantic seagrass Bioregion 2. This bioregion has ten seagrass species but is dominated by three species, Thalassia testudinum Banks ex König in König et Sims, Syringodium filiforme Kützing in Hohenacker and Halodule wrightii. However, the west coast of Africa only has H. wrightii and, extending from the Mediterranean Bioregion, Cymodocea nodosa (Ucria) Ascherson and Zostera noltii Hornemann (Short et al. 2007), both having their southernmost records at Senegal, while H. wrightii reaches its northern limit nearby at Banc d´Arguin in Mauritania (Cunha and Araújo 2009).

Unless geographical isolation occurs it would be expected to find these seagrasses growing in suitable locations around the Cape Verde archipelago. Notwithstanding, to date no seagrasses have been reported in the literature from the islands. The aim of the present study is to report the first record of seagrass in Cape Verde.

Methods

A search for seagrasses was conducted on Santiago Island, Cape Verde (15°03’N 23°39’W) in April 2015. Using local information, satellite images of the region (for coastal geomorphology and wave exposure) and researchers’ experience, sites most favorable for seagrass development were identified. When accessible shore dives were conducted by snorkel divers who searched the bottom at these sites. Where seagrass was found, photographs and qualitative samples were taken in accordance with the relevant legislation. Nine core (diameter 5 cm) samples were taken to estimate some population parameters (shoot density, as well as above and below ground biomass). Plants were examined and their morphology described.

Results

The seagrass Halodule wrightii was found at one location between Gamboa beach and Ilheu Santa Maria, Praia, Santiago Island (14°54'32.47"N 23°30'37.86"W; Fig. 1). This site contains a harbor area and is wave protected by the island (Ilheu Santa Maria) and a shallow reef to the south. H. wrightii formed a number of patches (≈10) covering a total of ≈ 20 m2 at 1.4–1.6 m depth on fine sand soft bottoms (Fig. 2). The mean shoot density was 5998 shoots∙m−2 (SE = 1247), canopy height was 8.3 cm (SE = 0.3), mean aboveground biomass was 22.96 g∙m−2 (SE = 5.45), mean belowground biomass was 101.25 g∙m−2 (SE = 19.97) and total biomass was 120 g∙m−2 (SE = 0.02). The marine gastropod Turritella bicingulata Lamarck, 1822 was the most outstanding animal associated with the H. wrightii beds. H. wrightii was also found at two other sites on Santiago Island (Moia-moia or Baía of Nossa Sra da Luz [15° 2'27.91"N; 23°27'2.44"W] and the bay south of Porto Lobo, [15° 0'3.25"N; 23°26'12.69"W], both on the south east side of Santiago Island, Fig. 1).
Fig. 2

Photograph of the shoalgrass (Halodule wrightii) bed at Praia, Santiago Island, Cape Verde

Description of Halodule wrightii Aschers. from Santiago Island, Cape Verde

Rhizomes (0.5-) 0.8 (−1.2) mm in diameter; internodes (1.3-) 2.4 (−3.7) cm long. Leaf sheath (0.9-) 2.3 (−4.2) cm long; leaf-blade (5.2-) 6.0 (−7.2) cm long and (0.3-) 0.6 (−0.8) mm wide, narrowed at the base, no small tooth on midrib, lateral nerves inconspicuous, ending in a narrow tooth usually 1/3–2/3 length of leaf width, apex bicuspidate, inner side of the lateral teeth more or less concave, sometimes with a few, very small, irregular serrations (Fig. 3). No flowers or fruit present.
Fig. 3

Leaf tips of examined material, bar = 1 mm

Discussion

The current record fills a knowledge gap regarding the distribution of seagrasses in the Tropical North Atlantic. According to den Hartog and Kuo (2006) H. wrightii is widely distributed in the Caribbean from Cuba and the smaller Antilles and southwards to Brazil at Paraná (de Souza Barros et al. 2014), whereas on the Atlantic coasts of Africa it is reported in Mauritania, Senegal and Angola but its distribution is expected to be wider (den Hartog and Kuo, 2006). According to the distribution map in Green and Short (2003; p 274) H. wrightii also occurs on the west coast of Africa in Nigeria, Benin, Ghana, Sierra Leone, Guinea, Guinea Bissau and São Tomé and Príncipe; on the east coast of Africa in Mozambique, Tanzania, Kenya; as well as Madagascar, Oman and the east coast of India. However, more recent genetic studies suggest that H. wrightii is not present on the eastern African coast (Waycott et al. 2004). The present record is located at an interesting biogeographic transition zone where northern and southern seagrass species meet, close to the northern latitudinal limit of H. wrightii at Banc d’Arguin, Mauritania, and to the southernmost record for meadows of Cymodocea nodosa, which are often mixed with H. wrightii and Z. noltii (Cunha and Araújo 2009).

It is important to note that there are numerous places online [e.g. IUCN red list (www.iucnredlist.org/), Encyclopedia of Life (www.eol.org/) etc.] where seagrass is recorded for the Cape Verde Islands. However records are inconsistent and primary sources are not supplied. For example the IUCN Red List database (IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2015–4. <www.iucnredlist.org>. Downloaded on 17 March 2016) describes the ‘Range Description’ of Z. noltii as “…also occurs in western Africa in Mauritania and in the Canary and Cape Verde Islands”, lists Cape Verde as a ‘Country of Occurrence’ and provides a map where the species is indicated as present. For C. nodosa the IUCN Red List database records “…extends into the Atlantic Ocean north to mid-Portugal and south to Madeira and to the Canary and Cape Verde Islands....”, provides a map where the species is indicated as present but does not list the Cape Verde Republic as a ‘Country of Occurrence’. H. wrightii is neither described nor mapped for the Cape Verde Archipelago or Republic in the IUCN Red List database.

It would seem that such records are likely based on ‘predicted distribution’ so actual survey data such as the present study are an important addition to anecdotal cases. It is important to point out that historically there has also been some confusion in the literature between the “Cap Vert = Cape Verde” (continental Africa, where seagrass occurs) and the Cape Verde Islands (Wirtz et al. 2013, and references therein).

The fact that seagrasses have not previously been reported for the Cape Verde Islands would suggest that they have simply been overlooked in the past. This is not surprising, as most phycologists have until now focused attention on the flora of the rocky shores of the area. One of the first scientists that may have overlooked seagrasses was the illustrious Charles Darwin; on board the HMS Beagle, as in 1832 his first extended port-of-call was at Praia, southeastern Santiago (Baarli et al. 2013) where we found H. wrightii. More recent descriptions of the shallow subtidal benthos of Cape Verde also make no mention of seagrasses (e.g. Morri et al. 2000; Otero-Schmitt 1995a, b, c; Entrambasaguas et al. 2008) so we believe that this is the first report of seagrasses in the archipelago. As such we would predict that a systematic survey of soft bottoms of the Cape Verde islands will probably result in further new records. The confirmation that seagrass occurs in the Cape Verde Archipelago is of wider relevance for local marine conservation as seagrass can be an important food source/habitat for protected species such as turtles.

Conclusions

Seagrass is reported for the first time for the Cape Verde Archipelago. Halodule wrightii was found at three locations on Santiago Island. The current record fills a knowledge gap regarding the distribution of seagrasses in the Tropical North Atlantic. We would predict that a systematic survey of soft bottoms of the Cape Verde islands will probably result in further new records of seagrasses in the region.

Abbreviations

SE Standard Error

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This study was made possible given the support from the Instituto Gulbenkian de Ciência de Portugal and the Cape Verde University. We thank Peter Wirtz and a reviewer for great advice.

Funding

JCC was supported by Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (Ciências do Mar 1137/2010); Fundação Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (E26/201.286/2014); and Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (305330/2010-1). AHE and EAS were supported by FCT — Portuguese Science Foundation through fellowships SFRH/BPD/63/03/2009 and SFRH/BPD/107878/2015.

Availability of supporting data

The dataset supporting the conclusions of this article is included within the article as photographs and geographical coordinates.

Authors’ contributions

JCC and AHE carried out fieldwork; JCC, AHE and ECD compiled records;. All authors wrote parts of, read and corrected the manuscript. All authors approved the final manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Laboratório de Ecologia Marinha Bêntica, Departamento de Ecologia, IBRAG, Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro
(2)
Centre of Marine Sciences (CCMAR), Universidade do Algarve
(3)
Santiago Dive Center
(4)
Departamento de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Eduardo Mondlane

References

  1. Baarli BG, Santos AG, Mayoral EJ, Ledesma-Vazquez J, Johnson ME, Da Silva CM, Cachão M. What Darwin did not see: Pleistocene fossil assemblages on a high-energy coast at Ponta das Bicudas, Santiago, Cape Verde Islands. Geol Mag. 2013;150:183–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Boekschoten G, Best MB. Fossil and recent shallow water corals from the Atlantic islands off western Africa. Zoologische Mededelingen. 1988;62:99–112.Google Scholar
  3. Cunha AH, Araújo A. New distribution limits of seagrass beds in West Africa. J Biogeogr. 2009;36:1621–2.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. D’Oliveira E. Espécies marinhas da Ilha de Santiago. Cape Verde, Tarrafal: Author; 2010.Google Scholar
  5. de Souza Barros KV, de Almeida R-BC, Magalhaes KM. Ecology of Brazilian seagrasses: Is our current knowledge sufficient to make sound decisions about mitigating the effects of climate change? Iheringia Série Botânica. 2014;68:155–70.Google Scholar
  6. den Hartog C, Kuo J. Taxonomy and biogeography of seagrasses. In: Green EP, Short F, editors. Seagrasses: Biology, Ecology and Conservation. Dordrecht: Springer; 2006. p. 1–23.Google Scholar
  7. Entrambasaguas L, Pérez-Ruzafa Á, García-Charton JA, Stobart B, Bacallado JJ. Abundance, spatial distribution and habitat relationships of echinoderms in the Cabo Verde Archipelago (eastern Atlantic). Mar Freshw Res. 2008;59:477–88.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Green EP, Short F. World Atlas of Seagrasses: Present Status and Future Conservation. Berkeley: University of California Press; 2003.Google Scholar
  9. Marco A, Pérez EA, Argüello CM, Martins S, Araujo S, Jurado LL. The international importance of the archipelago of Cape Verde for marine turtles, in particular the loggerhead turtle Caretta caretta. Zoologia Caboverdiana. 2011;2:1–11.Google Scholar
  10. Monteiro J, Almeida C, Freitas R, Delgado A, Porteiro F, Santos R. Coral assemblages of Cabo Verde: preliminary assessment and description. Fort Lauderdale, Florida: Proceedings of the 11th International Coral Reef Symposium; 2008. p. 1416–9.Google Scholar
  11. Morri C, Bianchi CN. Ecological niches of hermatypic corals at Ilha do Sal (Arquipélago de Cabo Verde). Boletim do Museu do Funchal. 1995;10 Suppl 4:473–85.Google Scholar
  12. Morri C, Cattaeno-Vietti R, Sartoni G, Bianchi C. Shallow epibenthic communities of Ilha do Sal (Cape Verde Archipelago, eastern Atlantic). Arquipélago. Life and Marine Sciences Ponta Delgada Açores. 2000;2(Suppl A):157–65.Google Scholar
  13. Otero-Schmitt J. Comunidades bentónicas marinas de las islas de Sal, San Vicente, Santiago, Fogo y Brava (Islas Cabo Verde). Vieraea: Folia Scientarum Biologicarum Canariensium. 1995a;24:1–11.Google Scholar
  14. Otero-Schmitt J. The communities of Galaxaura (Chaetangiaceae, Rhodophyta) at the Cape Verde Islands. Boletim do Museu do Funchal. 1995b;Suppl.4:543–549.Google Scholar
  15. Otero-Schmitt J. The communities of Laurencia (Rhodomelaceae, Rhodophyta) at the Cape Verde Islands. Boletim do Museu do Funchal. 1995c;Suppl.4:551–558.Google Scholar
  16. Short F, Carruthers T, Dennison W, Waycott M. Global seagrass distribution and diversity: A bioregional model. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol. 2007;350:3–20.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Waycott M, McMahon K, Mellors J, Calladine A, Kleine D. A guide to tropical seagrasses of the Indo-West Pacific. Townsville: James Cook University; 2004.Google Scholar
  18. Wirtz P, Brito A, Falcon JM, Freitas R, Fricke R, Monteiro V, Tariche O. The coastal fishes of the Cape Verde Islands–new records and an annotated check-list. Spixiana. 2013;36:113–42.Google Scholar

Copyright

© Creed et al. 2016

Advertisement