Open Access

Sipuncula inhabiting the coral Oculina patagonica in the western Mediterranean Sea

  • Luis Ferrero-Vicente1, 2Email author,
  • Esther Rubio-Portillo1, 2 and
  • Alfonso Ramos-Esplá1, 2
Marine Biodiversity Records20169:2

DOI: 10.1186/s41200-016-0003-z

Received: 28 January 2016

Accepted: 8 February 2016

Published: 8 March 2016

Abstract

Background

We analyzed the sipunculan fauna inhabiting the scleractinian coral Oculina patagonica in the Marine Reserve of Tabarca Island (western Mediterranean).

Results

Five sipunculan species were collected from 2011 to 2014: Phascolosoma stephensoni, P. granulatum, P. cf. agassizii, Aspidosiphon misakiensis, and Golfingia vulgaris. All five species were reported for the first time inhabiting O. patagonica; with P. cf. agassizii being a new record for the Iberian Peninsula. The average abundance of sipunculans inhabiting the coral was 468.75 ± 158.04 ind m−2, representing the second most abundant taxonomic group, in biomass, after Mollusca.

Conclusions

Sipunculan diversity was low comparing with tropical reefs, but species abundances were higher than in soft-bottom nearby areas and community structure appears to be more homogeneous. There may be a considerable contribution to the erosion of the coral skeleton by sipunculans.

Keywords

Sipuncula Oculina patagonica Associated macrofauna Coral Bioerosion Iberian Peninsula Mediterranean Sea

Background

Although the Sipuncula community is well characterized in soft-bottoms from our study area (Ferrero-Vicente et al. 2011, 2013a, 2014) (Fig. 1), hard-bottom species are largely unexplored. There are very few works on sipunculan ecology, and niches have not been well defined for the majority of species in this area (Cutler 1994; Ferrero-Vicente 2014). It is well known that some sipunculans are coral reef dwellers and active bioeroders, inhabiting crevices or galleries inside the calcareous skeletons (Reed 1980; Rice & Macintyre 1982; Cutler 1994). Found to be important bioeroders in many coral reefs (Hutchings 1986; Klein et al. 1991; Peyrot-Clausade et al. 1992; Gómez et al. 2013), this taxon can make a significant contribution to the bioerosion of the coral skeleton.
Fig. 1

Map of the Marine Reserve of Tabarca Island. S1 and S2 indicate the sampling areas

Oculina patagonica De Angelis, 1908 was recorded for the first time in the Mediterranean in 1966. It has been considered as an invasive species widely distributed throughout the Mediterranean coast (Zibrowius & Ramos 1983; Fine et al. 2001; Çinar et al. 2006) and abundant along the Spanish Mediterranean (Zibrowius & Ramos 1983; Ramos 1985; Izquierdo et al. 2007; Rubio-Portillo et al. 2014a, b). Recently, Leydet & Hellberg (2015) questioned the invasive nature of this species, denying a recent entry in the Mediterranean and considering the invasive behavior of the species as a consequence of changes in environmental conditions.

Many animal species live together with O. patagonica, including bivalves, gastropods, crustaceans, polychaetes, nemerteans, sipunculans and nematodes (Ferrero-Vicente, pers. obs.). Nonetheless, there is a lack of studies identifying which particular species inhabit these coral colonies and, as a result, their associated fauna is practically unknown. The number of sipunculans in the Mediterranean Sea reaches up to 36 different species (Ferrero-Vicente et al. 2012), and several of them are able to bore into coral (Saiz-Salinas 1993; Pancucci-Papadopoulou et al. 1999), but this ability is still not adequately documented for most species.

The aim of this study is to characterize the sipunculan community inhabiting O. patagonica.

Results

Five different sipunculan species were found inhabiting the coral (Figs. 2, 3 and 4), including Phascolosoma stephensoni (Stephen, 1942) as the most abundant one (relative abundance of 65.4 %), followed by Aspidosiphon misakiensis Ikeda, 1904 (15.4 %), P. granulatum Leuckart, 1828 and Golfingia vulgaris (de Blainville, 1827) (both 7.7 %), and finally P. cf. agassizii Keferstein, 1866 (3.8 %).
Fig. 2

Phascolosoma stephensoni: a Specimen with the introvert partially everted; b detail of a dissected specimen; c amplification of the cone-shaped papillae from the anterior part of the introvert; d amplification of the cone-shaped papillae from the posterior part of the introvert; e oocyte; f hooks from the rings in of the introvert; g amplification of cone-shaped papillae from the anterior part of the introvert; h amplification of cone-shaped papilla from the caudal part of the introvert

Fig. 3

a Specimen of Phascolosoma cf. agassizii with the introvert partially everted; b specimen of Phascolosoma granulatum with the introvert partially everted; c specimen of Golfingia vulgaris with the introvert partially everted; d hook of P. granulatum; e hook of G. vulgaris; f hook of P. cf. agassizii; g mid-trunk papilla of P. cf. agassizii

Fig. 4

Aspidosiphon misakiensis: a Specimen with the introvert partially everted; b preanal shield; c caudal shield; d bidentated hooks from the rings of the introvert; e scattered hook from the proximal part of the introvert

Density of total Sipuncula was 468.75 ± 158.04 ind m−2 (Fig. 5a), with Polychaeta, Crustacea and Mollusca presenting higher densities (7 343.65 ± 1 264.42 ind m−2, 5 156.25 ± 1 425.96 ind m−2 and 2 812.50 ± 458.45 ind m−2 respectively). In terms of biomass, Sipuncula was the second taxon of importance, contributing 17 % to the total ash-free dry weight of fauna associated with O. patagonica. The Mollusca was the taxonomic group with the highest contribution to the biomass, with 45 % of the total weight.
Fig. 5

a Abundance of the major taxa inhabiting Oculina patagonica; b contribution, in terms of biomass (ash-free dry weight), of the different taxa inhabiting Oculina patagonica. Calculated from ash-free dry weight

Discussion

Four out of the five species reported are new records for the Tabarca Island Marine Reserve: Aspidosiphon misakiensis, Phascolosoma cf. agassizii, P. stephensoni and Golfingia vulgaris. Furthermore, P. cf. agassizii is a new record for the Iberian Peninsula. These results are a consequence of the lack of studies on O. patagonica associated fauna and sipunculan fauna in general.

Considering Sipuncula is a phylum with a low number of species, approximately 150 (Cutler 1994), the diversity of sipunculans associated with coral ecosystems is relatively high and frequently with several specimens inhabiting a single rock (Rice 1975). In the case of the present study, the five species recorded in O. patagonica represent 14 % of the total known species in the Mediterranean Sea (Ferrero-Vicente 2014). This diversity is low compared to other coral reefs in the Caribbean (Gómez et al. 2013).

When comparing sipunculan abundance between different habitats, density in O. patagonica (468.75 ± 158.04 ind m−2) was more than 10 times higher than densities recorded in soft-bottoms of nearby areas, which ranged from 10–30 ind m−2 and presented a high natural variability between localities and years (Ferrero-Vicente et al. 2013a). Oculina patagonica colonies, which were collected randomly in space and time, appear to be more stable sipunculan communities —in abundance and species richness— compared to the soft-bottom sipunculan community, which is known to present a high spatial and temporal variability, both in abundance and species composition (Ferrero-Vicente 2014). Sipunculan fauna of south-western Caribbean reefs was described by Gómez et al. (Gómez et al. 2013) as relatively homogeneous in terms of abundance and number of species. This hypothesis must be supported by further studies in the case of sipunculans inhabiting Mediterranean hermatypic corals.

All species but G. vulgaris belong to the genera Phascolosoma and Aspidosiphon, species usually associated with hard bottoms and bioerosion on coral skeletons (Cutler 1994). Rock-boring sipunculans are usual inhabitants of both live and dead portions of coral skeletons, presumably in burrows of their own formation, contributing actively to the erosion of such structures by making them brittle (Rice 1975; Rice & Macintyre 1982; Klein et al. 1991; Antonelli et al. 2015). The abundance of sipunculans in the coral was much lower than other groups such as Polychaeta, Crustacea and Mollusca (Fig. 5a), which can also contain bioeroders species. Interestingly, Sipuncula was the second most abundant group after Mollusca in terms of biomass (Fig. 5b), likely due to the fact that individual sipunculans were usually much bigger than the mollusks or crustaceans present in the coral. Since 94 % of mollusks were vermetids, without bioerosion capabilities, Sipuncula is most likely the group with the highest contribution to the bioerosion of the O. patagonica skeleton. Their importance as bioeroders in many coral reefs was previously reported (Hutchings 1986; Klein et al. 1991; Peyrot-Clausade et al. 1992; Gómez et al. 2013).

Phascolosoma stephensoni is a common species persisting in hard substrata with a worldwide distribution. Despite it being the dominant sipunculan species inhabiting the O. patagonica skeleton samples (65.4 % of the total number of individuals) there are just a few records of the species around the Mediterranean Sea (Pancucci-Papadopoulou et al. 1999; Açik 2014). As suggested by Pancucci-Papadopoulou et al. (Pancucci-Papadopoulou et al. 1999), early identifications of P. stephensoni might have been misidentified as P. granulatum, a common and previously known species in the Mediterranean. On this basis, the distribution of P. stephensoni would be wider than expected. It is a common species found in hard substrata within the study area, appearing in rock crevices, algae rhizoids, seagrass rhizomes or mussel clusters (Ferrero-Vicente, pers. obs.).

Phascolosoma agassizii is not a common species in the Mediterranean, with just a few records. This is the westernmost record of the species in the Mediterranean and a new record for the Iberian Peninsula. Since species identification was on the basis of characters with some variability, such as number of hook rings, it has been identified with caution under the denomination cf.

Phascolosoma granulatum is a very common and highly distributed species in the Mediterranean Sea, appearing in a great variety of habitats (Cutler 1994; Pancucci-Papadopoulou et al. 1999). It was the only species previously reported in the marine reserve (Ramos 1985), inhabiting a vermetid reef species Dendropoma petraeum.

Golfingia vulgaris is a widespread species found in soft and hard substrata throughout the Mediterranean (Pancucci-Papadopoulou et al. 1999; Açik 2008, 2011; Ferrero-Vicente et al. 2013a). In the nearby areas it is a common and very abundant species in sediment trapped within algae rhizoids in shallow rocky bottoms (Ferrero-Vicente, pers. obs.). Even if species of the genus Golfingia are not commonly associated with corals, it seems that G. vulgaris can also live in coral skeletons, as evidenced by previous records in C. caespitosa (Koukouras et al. 1998; Açik 2008) and in O. patagonica in the present study. It is not clear whether this species is able to erode the coral, or if it simply occupies a discarded hole previously drilled by another sipunculan species or other organism.

Aspidosiphon misakiensis is present within just a few scarce records throughout the western Mediterranean, likely due to the lack of studies on sipunculan distribution. Aspidosiphon misakiensis is easily discernible from the similar species A. muelleri, found to be dominant in soft-bottoms from the studied area (Ferrero-Vicente et al. 2013a, b), by observing differences in the anal shield. In A. misakiensis the anal shield is granular (Fig. 4b) while in A. muelleri it is grooved. Aspidosiphon muelleri has not yet been recorded in O. patagonica, but is, by far, the most common species classified in soft substrata within nearby areas, dwelling in gastropod shells or preferably empty tubes of the serpulid polychaete Ditrupa arietina (Ferrero-Vicente et al. 2013b, 2014; Ferrero-Vicente 2014). Aspidosiphon muelleri has also been previously reported in diverse hard substrate habitats and even drilling activity has been also observed (Por 1975; Antonelli et al. 2015); therefore, its sporadic presence in O. patagonica within the studied area cannot be discarded.

Conclusions

The number of sipunculan species inhabiting O. patagonica was low compared with tropical reefs, but similar than soft-bottom species in nearby areas. Species abundances were higher and community structure appears to be more homogeneous than in the soft-bottom community. Sipunculans contribute significantly to the coral skeleton bioerosion.

Methods

The specimens studied were obtained from Oculina patagonica colonies in the Marine Reserve of Tabarca Island (Fig. 1, 38.1645° N; 0.4733° W), which is a hot spot for this species in the western Mediterranean. Oculina patagonica extends its distribution in the area to 12 m in depth, but the larger formations occur mostly in the shallowest layer (0–5 m) of rocky walls. The species was first documented in the island in 1983 (Ramos 1985), and according to (Izquierdo et al. 2007) it can be found the biggest colonies of the area and off the SE Iberian Peninsula, reaching sizes up to 50 cm in diameter. A total of 8 samplings were randomly carried out (from 2011 to 2014) in three different sites (from 2 areas where most of the colonies are concentrated). Samples from different colonies were randomly collected; 3 for each site and for each sampling day, giving a total of 72 samples.

Pieces of coral, ranging from 50 to 100 cm2, were ripped from the rocky substratum by scuba diving, using a chisel and a hammer. We immediately placed the collected pieces in zip-plastic bags prior to processing. Once at the laboratory, samples were fixed in 4 % formaldehyde. Afterward, the sipunculans were removed out of the coral skeleton by carefully crumbling the coral into tiny pieces using a small hammer. In order to identify the species, we observed the specimens under a binocular lens to study external morphology and dissections were conducted to analyze internal anatomy. Structures with taxonomic value such as hooks, skin papillae or oocytes (when present) were observed under a microscope (Fig. 2). Species identification was carried out according to (Saiz-Salinas 1993; Cutler 1994; Pancucci-Papadopoulou et al. 1999; Açik 2008, 2009, 2011; Ferrero-Vicente et al. 2012).

We measured the surface of the sampled colonies using image analysis techniques (carried out with Photoshop CS5) in order to obtain densities of individuals of the different taxa associated with the coral. Finally, we measured the ash-free dry weight of the different taxa through weight loss on ignition after 4 h at 400 °C inside a muffle furnace. The biomass was previously dried for 24 h at 80 °C in order to get a constant dry weight.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This work has been carried out within the CIESM’ project ‘Tropical Signals’. The authors wish to thank the MAGRAMA (Fisheries Secretary) and the Tabarca Marine Reserve staff, especially to Felio Lozano, for their logistic and administrative assistance. We are also grateful to Ashley Larson for her altruist work of reviewing the correct use of English grammar in the manuscript.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Marine Sciences and Applied Biology, University of Alicante
(2)
Research Marine Centre of Santa Pola (CIMAR), Santa Pola City Council–University of Alicante

References

  1. Açik S. Sipunculans along the Aegean coast of Turkey. Zootaxa. 2008;1852:21–36.Google Scholar
  2. Açik S. Soft-bottom sipunculans in Izmir Bay (Aegean Sea, eastern Mediterranean). Zootaxa. 2009;2136:40–8.Google Scholar
  3. Açik S. Sipuncula from the southern coast of Turkey (eastern Mediterranean), with a new report for the Mediterranean Sea. Cah Biol Mar. 2011;52(3):313–29.Google Scholar
  4. Açik S. Check-list of Sipuncula from the coasts of Turkey. Turk J Zool. 2014;38(6):723–33.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Antonelli F, Sacco-Perasso C, Ricci S, Davidde-Petriaggi B. Impact of the sipunculan Aspidosiphon muelleri Diesing, 1851 on calcareous underwater Cultural Heritage. Int Biodeterior Biodegradation. 2015;100:133–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Çinar ME, Bilecenoglu M, Öztürk B, Can A. New records of alien species on the Levantine coast Turkey. Aquat Invasions. 2006;1:84–90.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Cutler EB. The Sipuncula: their systematics, biology, and evolution. New York: Cornell University Press; 1994.Google Scholar
  8. Ferrero-Vicente LM. Distribution and ecology of soft-bottom Sipuncula from the western Mediterranean Sea. In: PhD Thesis. Spain: University of Alicante; 2014. p. 143.Google Scholar
  9. Ferrero-Vicente LM, Loya-Fernández Á, Marco-Méndez C, Martínez-García E, Sánchez-Lizaso JL. Soft–bottom sipunculans from San Pedro del Pinatar (Western Mediterranean): influence of anthropogenic impacts and sediment characteristics on their distribution. Anim Biodivers Conserv. 2011;34(1):101–11.Google Scholar
  10. Ferrero-Vicente LM, Loya-Fernández Á, Marco-Méndez C, Martínez-García E, Saiz-Salinas JI, Sánchez-Lizaso JL. First record of the sipunculan worm Phascolion (Phascolion) caupo Hendrix, 1975 in the Mediterranean Sea. Mediterr Mar Sci. 2012;1:89–92.Google Scholar
  11. Ferrero-Vicente LM, De-La-Ossa-Carretero JA, Del-Pilar-Ruso Y, Sánchez-Lizaso JL. Distribution of Sipuncula in the Gulf of Valencia and Cape Nao (western Mediterranean). Zootaxa. 2013a;3646(3):235–50.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Ferrero-Vicente LM, Marco-Méndez C, Loya-Fernández Á, Sánchez-Lizaso JL. Limiting factors on the distribution of shell/tube-dwelling sipunculans. J Exp Mar Bio Ecol. 2013b;446:345–54.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Ferrero-Vicente LM, Marco-Méndez C, Loya-Fernández Á, Sánchez-Lizaso J. Observations on the ecology and reproductive biology of the sipunculan worm Aspidosiphon muelleri in temperate waters. J Mar Biol Assoc UK. 2014;94(8):1629–38.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Fine M, Zibrowius H, Loya Y. Oculina patagonica: a non lessepsian scleractinian coral invading the Mediterranean Sea. Mar Biol. 2001;138:1195–203.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Gómez CE, Ardila NE, SanJuan-Muñoz A. Sipunculans associated with dead coral skeletons in the Santa Marta region of Colombia, south-western Caribbean. J Mar Biol Assoc UK. 2013;93(7):1785–93.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Hutchings PA. Biological destruction of coral reefs—a review. Coral Reefs. 1986;4:239–52.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Izquierdo A, Loya A, Díaz-Valdés M, Ramos-Esplá AA. Non-indigenous species at the Alicante harbour (SE-Spain): Oculina patagonica de Angelis, 1908, and Botrycapulus aculeatus (Gmelin, 1791). Rapports Commission Internationale pour l’Exploration Scientifique de la Mer Méditerranée [CIESM]. 2007;38:506.Google Scholar
  18. Klein R, Mokady O, Loya Y. Bioerosion in ancient and contemporary corals of the genus Porites: patterns and palaeoenvironmental implications. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 1991;77:245–51.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Koukouras A, Kuhlmann D, Voultsiadou E, Vafidis D, Dounas C, Chintiroglou C, et al. The macrofaunal assemblage associated with the scleractinian coral Cladocora caespitosa (L.) in the Aegean Sea. Ann Inst Oceanogr. 1998;74:97–114.Google Scholar
  20. Leydet KP, Hellberg ME. The invasive coral Oculina patagonica has not been recently introduced to the Mediterranean from the western Atlantic. BMC Evol Biol. 2015;15(1):79.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Pancucci-Papadopoulou MA, Murina GVV, Zenetos A. The phylum Sipuncula in the Mediterranean Sea. Athens: National Center for Marine Research; 1999. p. 109.Google Scholar
  22. Peyrot-Clausade M, Hutchings P, Richard G. Temporal variations of macroborers in massive Porites lobata on Moorea. French Polynesia Coral Reefs. 1992;11(3):161–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Por FD. Boring species of Aspidosiphon (Sipuncula) on the coasts of Israel. In: Rice ME, Todorović M, editors. Proceedings of the International Symposium on the Biology of the Sipuncula and Echiura. Belgrade: Naucno Delo Press; 1975. p. 301–4.Google Scholar
  24. Ramos AA. Contribución al conocimiento de las biocenosis bentónicas litorales de la Isla Plana o Nueva Tabarca. In: RAMOS AA, editor. La Reserva marina de la Isla Plana o Nueva Tabarca (Alicante). Alicante.: Universidad de Alicante; 1985. p. 111–47.Google Scholar
  25. Reed JK. Distribution and structure of deep-water Oculina varicosa coral reefs off central eastern Florida. Bull Mar Sci. 1980;30(3):667–77.Google Scholar
  26. Rice ME. Survey of the Sipuncula of the coral and beach-rock communities of the Caribbean Sea. In: Rice ME, Todorović M, editors. Proceedings of the International Symposium on the Biology of the Sipuncula and Echiura. Belgrade: Naucno Delo Press; 1975. p. 35–45.Google Scholar
  27. Rice ME, Macintyre IG. Distribution of Sipuncula in the coral reef community, Carrie Bow Cay, Belize. In: The atlantic barrier reef ecosystem at Carrie Bow Cay, Belize. 1982. p. 311–20.Google Scholar
  28. Rubio-Portillo E, Vázquez-Luis M, Izquierdo-Muñoz A, Ramos-Esplá AA. Distribution patterns of alien coral Oculina patagonica De Angelis D'Ossat, 1908 in western Mediterranean Sea. J Sea Res. 2014a;85:372–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Rubio-Portillo E, Vázquez-Luis M, Valle C, Izquierdo-Muñoz A, Ramos-Esplá AA. Growth and bleaching of the coral Oculina patagonica under different environmental conditions in the western Mediterranean Sea. Mar Biol. 2014b;161:2333–43.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Saiz-Salinas JI. Sipuncula. In: Fauna Ibérica, vol. 4. RAMOS, M.A. et al. (Eds.). Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales. CSIC. 1993.
  31. Zibrowius H, Ramos A. Oculina patagonica, scléractiniaire exotique en Méditerranée - nouvelles observations dans le Sud-Est de l’Espagne. Rapports Commission Internationale pour l’Exploration Scientifique de la Mer Méditerranée [CIESM]. 1983;28(3):297–301.Google Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s) 2016

Advertisement